BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1446131)

  • 1. Optimal central trapping (OPCETRA) vena caval filter: results of experimental studies.
    Kraimps JL; De La Faye D; Drouineau J; Bensignor E; Barbier J
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Nov; 3(4):697-701. PubMed ID: 1446131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro and in vivo experimental evaluation of a new vena caval filter.
    Qian Z; Yasui K; Nazarian GK; Vlodaver Z; Hunter DW; Castaneda-Zuniga WR; Amplatz K
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8054757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thrombus-trapping efficiency of the LGM (Vena Tech) and titanium Greenfield filters in vivo.
    Millward SF; Marsh JI; Pon C; Moher D
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Feb; 3(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 1540709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Experimental simulation of blood flow perturbations induced by the placement of caval filters and thrombi].
    Perrault R; Morin G; Doffin J
    J Mal Vasc; 1994; 19(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 7798806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the LGM Vena-Tech infrarenal vena cava filter in an ovine venous thromboembolism model.
    Crochet D; Grossetête R; Bach-Lijour B; Larguier L; Le Nihouannen JC
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 11389226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro evaluation of vena cava filters.
    Hammer FD; Rousseau HP; Joffre FG; Sentenac BP; Tran-Van T; Barthelemy RP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(6):869-76. PubMed ID: 7873867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro study of guide wire entrapment in currently available inferior vena cava filters.
    Stavropoulos SW; Itkin M; Trerotola SO
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Jul; 14(7):905-10. PubMed ID: 12847198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo evaluation of vena caval filters: can function be linked to design characteristics?
    Proctor MC; Cho KJ; Greenfield LJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(6):460-5. PubMed ID: 11232895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro flow phantom analysis and clot-capturing ability of incompletely opened Vena Tech-LGM vena caval filters.
    Korbin CD; Reed RA; Taylor FC; Kokoris SP; Teitelbaum GP
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1993; 16(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8435832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a spiral nitinol temporary inferior vena caval filter.
    Stecker MS; Barnhart WH; Lang EV
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Jun; 8(6):484-93. PubMed ID: 11394541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thrombus-trapping efficiency of the Greenfield filter in vivo.
    Thompson BH; Cragg AH; Smith TP; Bareniewski H; Barnhart WH; De Jong SC
    Radiology; 1989 Sep; 172(3 Pt 2):979-81. PubMed ID: 2772213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Results of long-term venacavography study after placement of a Greenfield vena caval filter.
    Lang W; Schweiger H; Hofmann-Preiss K
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1992; 33(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 1447276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple emboli and filter function: an in vitro comparison of three vena cava filters.
    Xian ZY; Roy S; Hosaka J; Kvernebo K; Laerum F
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 8850665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferior vena cava filters. Indications, safety, effectiveness.
    Becker DM; Philbrick JT; Selby JB
    Arch Intern Med; 1992 Oct; 152(10):1985-94. PubMed ID: 1417371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Percutaneously implanted permanent vena cava filter: follow-up of 117 consecutive patients].
    Erpenbach S; Gerlach A; Arlart IP
    Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 9376558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of filters in an oversized vena caval phantom: intracaval placement of a bird's nest filter versus biiliac placement of Greenfield, Vena Tech-LGM, and Simon nitinol filters.
    Korbin CD; Reed RA; Taylor FC; Pentecost MJ; Teitelbaum GP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Aug; 3(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1515730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The optional VenaTech(™) Convertible (™) vena cava filter: experimental study in sheep.
    Le Blanche AF; Ricco JB; Bonneau M; Reynaud P
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2012 Oct; 35(5):1181-7. PubMed ID: 21927988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo evaluation of a retrievable vena cava filter--the Dibie-Musset filter: experimental results.
    Dibie A; Musset D; Heissler M; Fournet JC; Palau R; Laborde F
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1998; 21(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 9502684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro function of an adjustable temporary venous spring filter: comparison with the temporary RF02 filter and the permanent Greenfield vena cava filter.
    Hosaka J; Roy S; Kvernebo K; Enge I; Laerum F
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5(9):620-5. PubMed ID: 9750891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numerical analysis of the hemodynamics and embolus capture of a greenfield vena cava filter.
    Swaminathan TN; Hu HH; Patel AA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 16706585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.