These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1446761)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 570 and Canon RK-1 autorefractors: II. Objective autorefraction in pseudophakes.
    Villada JR; Raj PS; Lewis AE; Joyce PW; Watson A
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 3)():287-9. PubMed ID: 1446761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 570 and Canon RK-1 autorefractors: I. Objective autorefraction in normal subjects.
    Raj PS; Villada JR; Lewis AE; Joyce PW; Watson A
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 3)():284-6. PubMed ID: 1446760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective autorefraction in posterior chamber pseudophakia.
    Raj PS; Akingbehin T; Levy AM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1990 Dec; 74(12):731-3. PubMed ID: 2275935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
    Lebow KA; Campbell CE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of automated refraction in anterior chamber pseudophakia.
    Sunder Raj P; Villada JR; Myint K; Lewis AE; Akingbehin T
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1991 Jan; 75(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 1991086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
    Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor.
    Kinge B; Midelfart A; Jacobsen G
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Jan; 80(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8664229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeatability of autorefraction and axial length measurements after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Bailey MD; Twa MD; Mitchell GL; Dhaliwal DK; Jones LA; McMahon TT
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):1025-34. PubMed ID: 15975474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Near vision after implantation of monofocal versus multifocal intraocular lenses].
    Dick HB; Krist R; Schwenn O; Pfeiffer N
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Jun; 218(6):406-11. PubMed ID: 11488005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of refraction--a literature review.
    Goss DA; Grosvenor T
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):619-30. PubMed ID: 8942135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.
    Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children.
    Choong YF; Chen AH; Goh PP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 16815252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Autorefraction after implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Bissen-Miyajima H; Minami K; Yoshino M; Nishimura M; Oki S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):553-6. PubMed ID: 20362844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical comparison of automated and manual keratometry in pre-operative ocular biometry.
    Sunderraj P
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 1)():60-2. PubMed ID: 1426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of an open-field autorefractor's ability to measure refraction and hence potential to assess objective accommodation in pseudophakes.
    Wolffsohn JS; Davies LN; Naroo SA; Buckhurst PJ; Gibson GA; Gupta N; Craig JP; Shah S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 95(4):498-501. PubMed ID: 20657018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of noncycloplegic refraction in primary school children in southern Thailand.
    Funarunart P; Tengtrisorn S; Sangsupawanich P; Siangyai P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 19530586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of the optical coherence method (Zeiss IOL-Master) with two ultrasonographic biometric methods for the calculation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses after phacoemulsification as part of clinical routine].
    Remsch H; Kampmeier J; Muche R; Lang GE; Lang GK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Oct; 221(10):837-42. PubMed ID: 15499518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraocular lens power calculation after radial keratotomy: estimating the refractive corneal power.
    Awwad ST; Dwarakanathan S; Bowman RW; Cavanagh HD; Verity SM; Mootha VV; McCulley JP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17531701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Manifest refraction versus autorefraction for patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization.
    Orr PR; Cramer LD; Hawkins BS; Bressler NM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 11157881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glare testing in pseudophakes with posterior capsule opacification.
    Sunderraj P; Villada JR; Joyce PW; Watson A
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 4)():411-3. PubMed ID: 1478316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.