247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1446913)
1. Malpractice risk the same for female and male ob/gyns.
Koska MT
Hospitals; 1992 Dec; 66(23):50. PubMed ID: 1446913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The 1992 ACOG survey. Professional liability: is gender a factor?
Malkasian GD
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Nov; 78(11):26-32, 48. PubMed ID: 10129536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical liability reform crisis 2008.
Weinstein SL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Feb; 467(2):392-401. PubMed ID: 18989732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Professional liability payments in obstetrics and gynecology.
Barbieri RL
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):578-81. PubMed ID: 16507927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Overview of the 1996 Professional Liability Survey.
Griffin LP; Heland KV; Esser L; Jones S
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1999 Feb; 54(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 9950003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of the medical malpractice crisis on OB-GYNs and patients in southern New Jersey.
Donlen J; Puro JS
N J Med; 2003 Sep; 100(9):12-9. PubMed ID: 14556589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The malpractice premium costs of obstetrics.
Norton SA
Inquiry; 1997; 34(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 9146508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Malpractice aside, OBGs are doing very well.
Paxton HT
Med Econ; 1988 Jun; 65(12):62-4, 66-7, 70-9. PubMed ID: 10287960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal issues impacting women's access to care in the United States-the malpractice insurance crisis.
Hale RW
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Sep; 94(3):382-5. PubMed ID: 16839555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Malpractice rates. How high now.
Rice B
Med Econ; 2004 Jan; 81(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 14959605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Neglect in obstetrics: high indemnities are threatening in cases of gross carelessness].
Molkentin T
Pflege Z; 1998 Oct; 51(10):752-5. PubMed ID: 10026568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Presidential address: medical-legal issues in obstetrics and gynecology.
Laros RK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):1883-9. PubMed ID: 15970843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ob/Gyns see new challenges to reputations and incomes.
Albertson D
Med Prod Sales; 1982 Dec; 13(12):32-3. PubMed ID: 10257619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Physician perceptions regarding competence of obstetrical providers and attitudes about other issues in obstetrical care.
Cooper CF; Lawler FH
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2001 Dec; 94(12):554-60. PubMed ID: 11775384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical records figure prominently in malpractice cases. A closed liability claims analysis.
Richards BC; Thomasson GO
Colo Med; 1992 Nov; 89(11):398-401. PubMed ID: 1424467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. County agrees to shield ob/gyns from liability.
Holthaus D
Hospitals; 1988 Jul; 62(14):42. PubMed ID: 3391549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The malpractice crisis: an attorney's viewpoint.
Pegalis SE
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1991; 67(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 2049570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Professional liability payments in obstetrics and gynecology.
Dillon WP; John Y
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):207-8; author reply 208. PubMed ID: 16816078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Study on defensive medicine practices among obstetricians and gynecologists who provide breast care.
Anderson BL; Strunk AL; Schulkin J
J Healthc Qual; 2011; 33(3):37-43. PubMed ID: 22414018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical liability and neurologically impaired infants: a special approach to handling claims.
Uehlin TL
J Med Assoc Ga; 1990 Mar; 79(3):171-3. PubMed ID: 2319221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
