BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1447378)

  • 1. Reproducibility of an electronic probe in relative attachment level measurements.
    Yang MC; Marks RG; Magnusson I; Clouser B; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):541-8. PubMed ID: 1447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring clinical attachment: reproducibility of relative measurements with an electronic probe.
    Clark WB; Yang MC; Magnusson I
    J Periodontol; 1992 Oct; 63(10):831-8. PubMed ID: 1403590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of manual and controlled-force attachment-level measurements.
    Reddy MS; Palcanis KG; Geurs NC
    J Clin Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 24(12):920-6. PubMed ID: 9442430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of manual and automated probing in an untreated periodontitis population.
    Oringer RJ; Fiorellini JP; Koch GG; Sharp TJ; Nevins ML; Davis GH; Howell TH
    J Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 68(12):1156-62. PubMed ID: 9444589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical and instrument problems in probing the gingival sulcus and periodontal pocket].
    Lange DE
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Jul; 40(7):693-700. PubMed ID: 3868576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of single and double probing attachment level measurements.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; Case D; Thomas J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 22(10):764-71. PubMed ID: 8682923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation between electronic and visual readings of pocket depths with a newly developed constant force probe.
    Magnusson I; Fuller WW; Heins PJ; Rau CF; Gibbs CH; Marks RG; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Mar; 15(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 3162464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probing around implants and teeth with healthy or inflamed peri-implant mucosa/gingiva. A histologic comparison in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis).
    Schou S; Holmstrup P; Stoltze K; Hjørting-Hansen E; Fiehn NE; Skovgaard LT
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Apr; 13(2):113-26. PubMed ID: 11952731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative reproducibility of proximal probing depth using electronic pressure-controlled and hand probing.
    Mullally BH; Linden GJ
    J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Apr; 21(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 8195446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Description and clinical evaluation of a new computerized periodontal probe--the Florida probe.
    Gibbs CH; Hirschfeld JW; Lee JG; Low SB; Magnusson I; Thousand RR; Yerneni P; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Feb; 15(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 3162246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controlled force measurements of gingival attachment level made with the Toronto automated probe using electronic guidance.
    Karim M; Birek P; McCulloch CA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1990 Sep; 17(8):594-600. PubMed ID: 2212091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probing and sound in periodontics.
    Touyz LZ; Hatchuel DA
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1985 Oct; 40(10):609-10. PubMed ID: 3868840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intra - and inter-examiner reproducibility in constant force probing.
    Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Dec; 22(12):918-22. PubMed ID: 8613559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe.
    Osborn JB; Stoltenberg JL; Huso BA; Aeppli DM; Pihlstrom BL
    J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1573541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clinical study of an electronic constant force periodontal probe.
    Tupta-Veselicky L; Famili P; Ceravolo FJ; Zullo T
    J Periodontol; 1994 Jun; 65(6):616-22. PubMed ID: 8083795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Periodontal probe precision using 4 different periodontal probes.
    Mayfield L; Bratthall G; Attström R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Feb; 23(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 8849842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe.
    Osborn J; Stoltenberg J; Huso B; Aeppli D; Pihlstrom B
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):497-503. PubMed ID: 2391627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Site-specific attachment level change detected by physical probing in untreated chronic adult periodontitis: review of studies 1982-1997.
    Breen HJ; Johnson NW; Rogers PA
    J Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 70(3):312-28. PubMed ID: 10225549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of pocket depth and attachment level measurements when using a flexible splint.
    Isidor F; Karring T; Attström R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Nov; 11(10):662-8. PubMed ID: 6594353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of gingival health status on periodontal probing measurements. A clinical study in humans.
    Molina GO; Souza SL; Grisi MF; Novaes AB; Taba M
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 6(2):56-62. PubMed ID: 15125016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.