116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1447379)
1. Evaluation of a new periodontal curet. An in vitro study.
Singer DL; Long BA; Lozanoff S; Senthilselvan A
J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):549-52. PubMed ID: 1447379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between a short and a conventional blade periodontal curet: an in vitro study.
Landry C; Long B; Singer D; Senthilselvan A
J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Aug; 26(8):548-51. PubMed ID: 10450816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness of scaling and root planing with curets designed for deep pockets.
Nagy RJ; Otomo-Corgel J; Stambaugh R
J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12):954-9. PubMed ID: 1474467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits.
Kocher T; Langenbeck M; Rühling A; Plagmann HC
J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo scaling and root planing forces in molars.
Zappa U; Röthlisberger JP; Simona C; Case D
J Periodontol; 1993 May; 64(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 8515364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro study of oscillating instruments for root planing.
Mengel R; Buns C; Stelzel M; Flores-de-Jacoby L
J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Sep; 21(8):513-8. PubMed ID: 7989614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of curet and ultrasonics on root surfaces.
Cross-Poline GN; Stach DJ; Newman SM
Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):131-3. PubMed ID: 8599589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
Drisko CH
Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An imaging routine for assessing the efficacy of instruments used for scaling and root planing.
Lozanoff S; Long BA; Singer DL; Deptuch JJ
J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 1447380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study.
Silva D; Martins O; Matos S; Lopes P; Rolo T; Baptista I
Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adhesion and growth of cultured human gingival fibroblasts on periodontally involved root surfaces treated by Er:YAG laser.
Feist IS; De Micheli G; Carneiro SR; Eduardo CP; Miyagi S; Marques MM
J Periodontol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1368-75. PubMed ID: 14584872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of tooth instrumentation roughness on subgingival microbial colonization.
Leknes KN; Lie T; Wikesjö UM; Bogle GC; Selvig KA
J Periodontol; 1994 Apr; 65(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 8195973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative in vitro effectiveness of closed root debridement with fine instruments on specific areas of mandibular first molar furcations. II. Furcation area.
Otero-Cagide FJ; Long BA
J Periodontol; 1997 Nov; 68(11):1098-101. PubMed ID: 9407403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rationale and techniques of non-surgical pocket management in periodontal therapy.
Rawlinson A; Walsh TF
Br Dent J; 1993 Mar; 174(5):161-6. PubMed ID: 8443021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontal treatment: a review.
Arabaci T; Ciçek Y; Canakçi CF
Int J Dent Hyg; 2007 Feb; 5(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17250573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Root surface debridement and endotoxin removal.
Cadosch J; Zimmermann U; Ruppert M; Guindy J; Case D; Zappa U
J Periodontal Res; 2003 Jun; 38(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 12753358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Absence of histologic signs of chronic inflammation following closed subgingival scaling and root planing using the dental endoscope: human biopsies - a pilot study.
Wilson TG; Carnio J; Schenk R; Myers G
J Periodontol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):2036-41. PubMed ID: 18980510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative clinical responses related to the use of various periodontal instrumentation.
Obeid PR; D'Hoore W; Bercy P
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 15016023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro comparison of root surface roughness and bacterial adhesion following treatment with three different instruments.
Haroon F; Gregory RL; Hara A; Blanchard SB; Hamada Y
J Periodontol; 2022 May; 93(5):e83-e91. PubMed ID: 34338309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Personnel and instrumental differences in the treatment of root surfaces. A comparison on a phantom model].
Stassinakis A; Hugo B; Hotz P
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(5):623-8. PubMed ID: 7784877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
