These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1447561)

  • 1. Effects of same-modality interference on immediate serial recall of auditory and visual information.
    Turner ML; Johnson SK; McNamara DS; Engle RW
    J Gen Psychol; 1992 Jul; 119(3):247-63. PubMed ID: 1447561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enumeration produces poor primacy for tactile presentation relative to visual and auditory presentation as the only modality effect.
    Gibbons JA; Velkey AJ; Partin KT
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Jun; 106(3):795-810. PubMed ID: 18712201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Input and output modality effects in immediate serial recall.
    Harvey AJ; Beaman CP
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):693-700. PubMed ID: 17924278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual and auditory modality and suffix effects in young and elderly adults.
    Manning SK; Greenhut-Wertz J
    Exp Aging Res; 1990; 16(1-2):3-9. PubMed ID: 2265663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The modality effect and echoic persistence.
    Watkins OC; Watkins MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):251-78. PubMed ID: 6447188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.
    Beaman CP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):371-89. PubMed ID: 12047050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memory as embodiment: The case of modality and serial short-term memory.
    Macken B; Taylor JC; Kozlov MD; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():113-124. PubMed ID: 27376662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recency and suffix effects with immediate recall of olfactory stimuli.
    Miles C; Jenkins R
    Memory; 2000 May; 8(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 10889902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of recall procedures on the modality effect with numbers and enumerated stimuli.
    Gibbons JA; Velkey AK; Partin KT
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):84-104. PubMed ID: 18318410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Paradoxical effects of presentation modality on false memory.
    Cleary AM; Greene RL
    Memory; 2002 Jan; 10(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 11747576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large auditory and small visual effects in the recall of consonant letters.
    Locke JL
    Am J Psychol; 1978 Mar; 91(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 665869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption.
    Campbell T; Beaman CP; Berry DC
    Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):199-214. PubMed ID: 11958724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Some differences between the visual and auditory memories in the short-term memory].
    Hamada J
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1990 Apr; 61(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 2250420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disruption of order information by irrelevant items: a serial recognition paradigm.
    Gisselgård J; Uddén J; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 16777043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrusive effects of implicitly processed information on explicit memory.
    Sentz DF; Kirkhart MW; LoPresto C; Sobelman S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Feb; 94(1):241-50. PubMed ID: 11883569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of retrieval practice and presentation modality on verbal learning: testing the limits of the testing effect.
    Wilkinson AM; Hall ACG; Hogan EE
    Memory; 2019 Sep; 27(8):1144-1157. PubMed ID: 31234716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Common modality effects in immediate free recall and immediate serial recall.
    Grenfell-Essam R; Ward G; Tan L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1909-1933. PubMed ID: 28557502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing.
    Burton MW; Locasto PC; Krebs-Noble D; Gullapalli RP
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):647-61. PubMed ID: 15955475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning and retrieval rate of words presented auditorily and visually.
    Brand N; Jolles J
    J Gen Psychol; 1985 Apr; 112(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 4056765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.