These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1447692)

  • 1. Natural sample spaces and uncertain belief.
    Gavanski I; Hui C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1992 Nov; 63(5):766-80. PubMed ID: 1447692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in causal learning and decision making.
    Osman M; Shanks DR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Sep; 120(1):93-112. PubMed ID: 15982627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Source reliability and the conjunction fallacy.
    Jarvstad A; Hahn U
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):682-711. PubMed ID: 21564268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency, probability, and prediction: easy solutions to cognitive illusions?
    Griffin D; Buehler R
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):48-78. PubMed ID: 10090798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample representativeness affects whether judgments are influenced by base rate or sample size.
    Obrecht NA; Chesney DL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Mar; 142(3):370-82. PubMed ID: 23422291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A quantum theory account of order effects and conjunction fallacies in political judgments.
    Yearsley JM; Trueblood JS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1517-1525. PubMed ID: 28879495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Origins of the sample-size effect in explicit evaluative judgment.
    Kaufmann M; Betsch T
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(5):344-53. PubMed ID: 19447750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
    Heit E; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):805-12. PubMed ID: 20438276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heuristic decision making.
    Gigerenzer G; Gaissmaier W
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2011; 62():451-82. PubMed ID: 21126183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation.
    Tentori K; Crupi V; Russo S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):235-255. PubMed ID: 22823498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic causal reasoning with verbal information.
    Meder B; Mayrhofer R
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Aug; 96():54-84. PubMed ID: 28623726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilization of base-rate information during feeling-of-knowing judgments.
    Calogero M; Nelson TO
    Am J Psychol; 1992; 105(4):565-73. PubMed ID: 1481952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ownership and object history.
    Friedman O; Neary KR; Defeyter MA; Malcolm SL
    New Dir Child Adolesc Dev; 2011; 2011(132):79-89. PubMed ID: 21671343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantum Cognition.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2022 Jan; 73():749-778. PubMed ID: 34546804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The rational status of quantum cognition.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR; Shiffrin RM; Yearsley JM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jul; 146(7):968-987. PubMed ID: 28447840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Belief revision in children: serial judgment in social cognition and decision-making domains.
    Schlottmann A; Anderson NH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1349-64. PubMed ID: 8744968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are people excessive or judicious in their egocentrism? A modeling approach to understanding bias and accuracy in people's optimism.
    Windschitl PD; Rose JP; Stalkfleet MT; Smith AR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 95(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 18665701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Influence of Effortful Thought and Cognitive Proficiencies on the Conjunction Fallacy: Implications for Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning and Judgment.
    Scherer LD; Yates JF; Baker SG; Valentine KD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jun; 43(6):874-887. PubMed ID: 28903676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emotion and the law: a framework for inquiry.
    Wiener RL; Bornstein BH; Voss A
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):231-48. PubMed ID: 16786409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.