These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14480989)

  • 1. Interaction of information displays with control system dynamics and course frequency in continuous tracking.
    OBERMAYER RW; SWARTZ WF; MUCKLER FA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1962 Aug; 15():199-215. PubMed ID: 14480989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tracking performance with advanced and delayed visual displays.
    Gifford RN; Lyman J
    Hum Factors; 1967 Apr; 9(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 6039261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of kinesthetic-tactual and visual displays via a critical tracking task.
    Jagacinski RJ; Miller DP; Gilson RD
    Hum Factors; 1979 Feb; 21(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 468269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of display magnification, proprio- ceptive cues, control dynamics and trajectory characteristics on compensatory tracking performance.
    Smith RL; Garfinkle DR; Groth H; Lyman J
    Hum Factors; 1966 Oct; 8(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 5966935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LEVEL OF DISPLAY INTEGRATION IN COMPENSATORY TRACKING.
    SAMPSON PB; ELKIN EH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Feb; 20():59-62. PubMed ID: 14286557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tracking performance with visual, auditory, or electrocutaneous displays.
    Hofmann MA; Heimstra NW
    Hum Factors; 1972 Apr; 14(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 5022472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning and performance as a function of the percentage of pursuit component in a tracking display.
    Briggs GE
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Feb; 71(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 5903001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A psychophysiological study of compensatory tracking on a digital display.
    Benson AJ; Huddleston JH; Rolfe JM
    Hum Factors; 1965 Oct; 7(5):457-72. PubMed ID: 5882207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A test of the effectiveness of sensor lines showing linkages between displays and controls.
    Chapanis A; Lockhead GR
    Hum Factors; 1965 Jun; 7(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 5867017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of operator performance on a tracking task using discretely and continuously variable controls.
    Hammerton M; Tickner AH
    J Appl Psychol; 1968 Aug; 52(4):319-20. PubMed ID: 5665560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of nonlinearities on human operator tracking performance: a review of the literature. AMRL-TR-65-158.
    Wasicko RJ; Magdaleno RE
    AMRL TR; 1965 Sep; ():1-40. PubMed ID: 5321053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of control placement on information transfer rate using bisensory signals.
    Perriment AD
    J Appl Psychol; 1968 Oct; 52(5):357-61. PubMed ID: 5681113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CONTROL SYSTEM LAGS AND MAN-MACHINE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE. NASA CR-83.
    MUCKLER FA; OBERMAYER RW
    NASA Contract Rep NASA CR; 1964 Jul; ():1-31. PubMed ID: 14241456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equipment note. Apparatus for the investigation of sensori-motor skills.
    Peacock JB; Price MD
    Ergonomics; 1972 Jan; 15(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 5029930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human operator describing functions with visual and tactile displays. NASA CR-623.
    Bliss JC
    NASA Contract Rep NASA CR; 1967 Feb; ():163-75. PubMed ID: 5297966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of various display-control configurations on tracking with identical and different coordinate dynamics.
    CHERNIKOFF R; LEMAY M
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Jul; 66():95-9. PubMed ID: 14020606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual and tactile tracking with step commands. NASA CR-623.
    Bliss JC; Brody WR; Lane B
    NASA Contract Rep NASA CR; 1967 Feb; ():119-61. PubMed ID: 5297962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EXAMINATION OF ONBOARD TRAINING FOR EXTENDED SPACE FLIGHTS. NASA TN D-2162.
    REID R; SAUCER RT
    NASA Contract Rep NASA CR; 1964 Nov; ():1-27. PubMed ID: 14241455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of the operator's handedness on some directional stereotypes in control-display relationships.
    Chapanis A; Gropper BA
    Hum Factors; 1968 Aug; 10(4):303-19. PubMed ID: 5726868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of switch configuration on the operation of a switch matrix.
    Lincoln RS; Konz SA
    J Appl Psychol; 1966 Oct; 50(5):375-82. PubMed ID: 5918818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.