123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1448244)
1. Does closure of Camper fascia reduce the incidence of post-cesarean superficial wound disruption?
Del Valle GO; Combs P; Qualls C; Curet LB
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):1013-6. PubMed ID: 1448244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subcutaneous tissue approximation in relation to wound disruption after cesarean delivery in obese women.
Naumann RW; Hauth JC; Owen J; Hodgkins PM; Lincoln T
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Mar; 85(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 7862382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superficial wound disruption after cesarean delivery: effect of the depth and closure of subcutaneous tissue.
Cetin A; Cetin M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Apr; 57(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 9175664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery.
Ramsey PS; White AM; Guinn DA; Lu GC; Ramin SM; Davies JK; Neely CL; Newby C; Fonseca L; Case AS; Kaslow RA; Kirby RS; Rouse DJ; Hauth JC
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):967-73. PubMed ID: 15863532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors for wound disruption following cesarean delivery.
Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Figueroa D; Biggio JR; Owen J; Tita AT
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Aug; 27(12):1237-40. PubMed ID: 24090116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of evidence-based interventions on wound complications after cesarean delivery.
Temming LA; Raghuraman N; Carter EB; Stout MJ; Rampersad RM; Macones GA; Cahill AG; Tuuli MG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):449.e1-449.e9. PubMed ID: 28601567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of subcutaneous closure in preventing wound complications after cesarean delivery with Pfannenstiel incision: a randomized clinical trial.
Corbacioglu Esmer A; Goksedef PC; Akca A; Akbayir O; Dagdeviren H; Turan GY; Yarsilikal F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Mar; 40(3):728-35. PubMed ID: 24738117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suture closure of subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
Chelmow D; Rodriguez EJ; Sabatini MM
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 103(5 Pt 1):974-80. PubMed ID: 15121573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Suture Compared With Staple Closure of Skin Incision for High-Order Cesarean Deliveries.
Fox NS; Melka S; Miller J; Bender S; Silverstein M; Saltzman DH; Rebarber A
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 131(3):523-528. PubMed ID: 29420412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wound length and corticosteroid administration as risk factors for surgical-site complications following cesarean section.
De Vivo A; Mancuso A; Giacobbe A; Priolo AM; De Dominici R; Maggio Savasta L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Mar; 89(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 20199351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status.
Fitzwater JL; Jauk VC; Figueroa D; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Tita AT
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
Cooper SM; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Tita ATN
Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Mackeen AD; Khalifeh A; Fleisher J; Vogell A; Han C; Sendecki J; Pettker C; Leiby BE; Baxter JK; Sfakianaki A; Berghella V
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):1169-1175. PubMed ID: 24807325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A barrier retractor to reduce surgical site infections and wound disruptions in obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Scolari Childress KM; Gavard JA; Ward DG; Berger K; Gross GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):285.e1-285.e10. PubMed ID: 26440690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vertical skin incisions and wound complications in the obese parturient.
Wall PD; Deucy EE; Glantz JC; Pressman EK
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):952-6. PubMed ID: 14672469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Closure of the subcutaneous dead space and wound disruption after Cesarean delivery.
Chelmow D; Huang E; Strohbehn K
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Jun; 11(6):403-8. PubMed ID: 12389657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical factors in abdominal wound closure: the prevention of fascial dehiscence.
Poole GV
Surgery; 1985 Jun; 97(6):631-40. PubMed ID: 3890240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture.
Murtha AP; Kaplan AL; Paglia MJ; Mills BB; Feldstein ML; Ruff GL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1769-80. PubMed ID: 16651950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
