These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1449417)

  • 1. Review of obstetric operative intervention rates.
    Foote AJ; Giles WB
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Sep; 18(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 1449417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vanishing forceps delivery.
    Poma PA
    Am J Perinatol; 1999; 16(5):227-31. PubMed ID: 10535615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Persistent Occiput Posterior position - OUTcomes following manual rotation (POP-OUT): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Phipps H; Hyett JA; Kuah S; Pardey J; Ludlow J; Bisits A; Park F; Kowalski D; de Vries B
    Trials; 2015 Mar; 16():96. PubMed ID: 25872776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epidural analgesia and operative delivery: a ten-year population-based cohort study in The Netherlands.
    Wassen MM; Hukkelhoven CW; Scheepers HC; Smits LJ; Nijhuis JG; Roumen FJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():125-31. PubMed ID: 25461365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The mounting rate of cesarean sections. Is it accompanied by a drop in instrumental births?
    Gharaibeh AM; Al-Bdour AE; Akasheh HF
    Saudi Med J; 2008 Feb; 29(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 18246239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trends in obstetric operative procedures, 1980 to 1987.
    Zahniser SC; Kendrick JS; Franks AL; Saftlas AF
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Oct; 82(10):1340-4. PubMed ID: 1415856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Trends in the frequency of obstetrical operations and perinatal mortality in the Czech Republic in comparison with other countries].
    Stembera Z
    Ceska Gynekol; 1995 Jun; 60(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 7670703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of obstetric intervention rates: case-mix, staffing levels and organisational factors of hospital of birth.
    Joyce R; Webb R; Peacock J
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Nov; 22(6):618-25. PubMed ID: 12554248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transverse occiput position: Using manual Rotation to aid Normal birth and improve delivery OUTcomes (TURN-OUT): A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    de Vries B; Phipps H; Kuah S; Pardey J; Ludlow J; Bisits A; Park F; Kowalski D; Hyett JA
    Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():362. PubMed ID: 26282668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. International differences in the use of obstetric interventions.
    Notzon FC
    JAMA; 1990 Jun; 263(24):3286-91. PubMed ID: 2348539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Epidemiological surveillance and obstetrical dystocias surgery in Senegal].
    Bouillin D; Fournier G; Gueye A; Diadhiou F; Cissé CT
    Sante; 1994; 4(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 7850191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation in the rates of operative delivery in the United States.
    Clark SL; Belfort MA; Hankins GD; Meyers JA; Houser FM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 196(6):526.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17547880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does advanced operative obstetrics still have a place in contemporary practice?
    Tempest N; Navaratnam K; Hapangama DK
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 27(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 25692505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in the reported frequencies of some obstetrical interventions in Europe.
    Bergsjø P; Schmidt E; Pusch D
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Jul; 90(7):628-32. PubMed ID: 6871130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate.
    DeMott RK; Sandmire HF
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Jul; 341(1):53; author reply 54-5. PubMed ID: 10391755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The association between increasing maternal age at first birth and decreased rates of spontaneous vaginal birth in South Australia from 1991 to 2009.
    Baghurst P; Robson S; Antoniou G; Scheil W; Bryce R
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jun; 54(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 24506445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in London.
    McDonnell S; Chandraharan E
    J Pregnancy; 2015; 2015():627810. PubMed ID: 26078882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study.
    Roberts CL; Tracy S; Peat B
    BMJ; 2000 Jul; 321(7254):137-41. PubMed ID: 10894690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.