These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14495816)

  • 1. [Comparative determination tests for the microbial content of air with the Bourdillon, Lidwell and Thomas slit sampler and with sodium glutamate and saccharose filters].
    SACCANI CF; PALLADINO D
    Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1961; 40():430-6. PubMed ID: 14495816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Fungi and bacteria on air filters from heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems: a method for determination of fungi and bacteria on air filters].
    Möritz M; Martiny H
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1997 Apr; 199(6):513-26. PubMed ID: 9376064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [LIQUID FOAMY FILTERS FOR THE RECOVERY OF BACTERIAL AEROSOLS].
    SINELNIKOVA EP
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1963 Apr; 40():49-53. PubMed ID: 14072291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microbial content of HEPA filtered air.
    Keitt GW
    Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1966; 20(5):137-50. PubMed ID: 5331190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BACTERIA-TRAPPING DEVICES IN THE DETERMINATION OF BACTERIAL CONCENTRATIONS OF AEROSOLS].
    KIKTENKO VS; KUDRIAVTSEV SI; PUSHCHIN NI
    Gig Sanit; 1963 Oct; 28():45-8. PubMed ID: 14187229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emission of microbial aerosols from sewage treatment plants that use trickling filters.
    Goff GD; Splendlove JC; Adams AP; Nicholes PS
    Health Serv Rep; 1973; 88(7):640-52. PubMed ID: 4583449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Sampling of air-borne bacteria by gelatine-foam-filters].
    Rotter M; Koller W
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B; 1973 May; 157(2):257-70. PubMed ID: 4581892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Electrostatic air filters for dental practice].
    Iversen DB; Tolo K
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1975 Dec; 85(11):446-8. PubMed ID: 1060050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CONVENIENT SAMPLING OF AIR BACTERIA IN OPERATING ROOMS.
    WARNER P; GLASSCO A; KROEKER J
    Can Med Assoc J; 1964 Feb; 90(8):537-9. PubMed ID: 14118695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative studies of gelatin and cellulose ester membrane filters for their suitability in determining the microorganism count in the air].
    Hecker W; Meier R; Thevenin JP; Hartberger K
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1983 Jun; 177(5):375-93. PubMed ID: 6367306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Air filtration and prevention of aspergillary pneumopathies. Preliminary comparative study of two mobile units for bacteriological air purification with recycling.
    Perraud M; Nicolle MC; Chiarello E; Tissot Guerraz F; Cetre JC; Sepetjan M
    Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1992; 34(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 1448350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Further investigations on the suitability of gelatine filters for the collection of airborne bacteria].
    Koller W; Rotter M
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B; 1974 Dec; 159(5-6):546-59. PubMed ID: 4618019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of bacterial recovery by Reuter centrifugal air sampler and slit-to-agar sampler.
    Placencia AM; Peeler JT; Oxborrow GS; Danielson JW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 44(2):512-3. PubMed ID: 6751234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparative effectiveness of the samplers of air microbiology].
    Evdokimov VL; Balashov MP; Dadalova AI; Kraeva VN
    Lab Delo; 1980; (4):243-6. PubMed ID: 6155557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of membrane filters in the bacteriological examination of water and air.
    GOHAR MA; EISSA AA
    Z Hyg Infektionskr; 1957; 143(4):364-70. PubMed ID: 13434263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of bioaerosol sampling techniques for the detection of Chlamydophila psittaci in contaminated air.
    Van Droogenbroeck C; Van Risseghem M; Braeckman L; Vanrompay D
    Vet Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 135(1-2):31-7. PubMed ID: 18963601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative evaluation of a new centrifugal air sampler (RCS) with a slit air sampler (SAS) in a hospital environment.
    Nakhla LS; Cummings RF
    J Hosp Infect; 1981 Sep; 2(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 6174596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative evaluation of bacteriological methods of analysis of air in closed premises].
    VLODAVETS VV
    Gig Sanit; 1957 Jan; 22(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 13428025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A modification of the Andersen sampler for use in occupied environments.
    Lidwell OM; Noble WC
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1965 Aug; 28(2):280-2. PubMed ID: 5317979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clean rooms and sterile "laminar air flow"].
    Christensen EA; Kristensen H
    Nord Med; 1968 Apr; 79(14):462-5. PubMed ID: 4872512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.