58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1449870)
1. Comparison of 12-bit and 8-bit gray scale resolution in MR imaging of the CNS. An ROC analysis.
Smith HJ; Bakke SJ; Smevik B; Hald JK; Moen G; Rudenhed B; Abildgaard A
Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):505-11. PubMed ID: 1449870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Hard-copy (film) versus soft-copy (CRT) reading performance between compressed and uncompressed images: SOLs in abdominal CT images].
Ando Y; Tsukamoto N; Kawaguchi O; Kitamura M; Kunieda E; Kubo A; Ogasawara K; Kinosada Y; Maeda T; Kozuka T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Sep; 59(11):521-5. PubMed ID: 10536448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance characteristics and image fidelity of gray-scale monitors.
Dwyer SJ; Stewart BK; Sayre JW; Aberle DR; Boechat MI; Honeyman JC; Boehme JM; Roehrig H; Ji TL; Blaine GJ
Radiographics; 1992 Jul; 12(4):765-72. PubMed ID: 1636038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gray scale resolution of MR images.
Channin DS; Prior FW
Acta Radiol; 1993 Nov; 34(6):636. PubMed ID: 8240905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of bi-level image converting methods for nuclear medicine image database stored in the IS&C magneto-optical disk.
Tsukamoto N; Ando Y; Kunieda E; Kawaguchi O; Shigematsu N; Kubo A; Arai Y
Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():442. PubMed ID: 8591224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems.
Kim AY; Cho KS; Song KS; Kim JH; Kim JG; Ha HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 11461856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative 3T MR imaging of rectal cancer: local staging accuracy using a two-dimensional and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence.
Fütterer JJ; Yakar D; Strijk SP; Barentsz JO
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18164156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of video display on the grading of diabetic retinopathy.
Costen MT; Newsom RS; Parkin B; Marsh CS; Mehta RL; Luff AJ; Canning CR
Eye (Lond); 2004 Feb; 18(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 14762410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Display of CT studies on a two-screen electronic workstation versus a film panel alternator: sensitivity and efficiency among radiologists.
Foley WD; Jacobson DR; Taylor AJ; Goodman LR; Stewart ET; Gurney JW; Stroka D
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):769-73. PubMed ID: 2305060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increasing the number of gray shades in medical display systems--how much is enough?
Kimpe T; Tuytschaever T
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Dec; 20(4):422-32. PubMed ID: 17195900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noise content analysis in clinical digital images.
Chuang KS; Liu BJ; Huang HK; Yonekawa H; Sankaran A
Radiographics; 1994 Mar; 14(2):397-403; discussion 404-5. PubMed ID: 8190962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hard-copy versus soft-copy image reading for detection of ureteral stones on abdominal radiography.
Ueda K; Iwasaki S; Nagasawa M; Sueyoshi S; Takahama J; Ide K; Kichikawa K
Radiat Med; 2003; 21(5):210-3. PubMed ID: 14632296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective, controlled trial of eight-bit, 16-bit, and 24-bit digital color images in electronic endoscopy.
Vakil N; Bourgeois K
Endoscopy; 1995 Oct; 27(8):589-92. PubMed ID: 8608752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimized algorithms for displaying 16-bit gray scale images on 8-bit computer graphic systems.
Gillespy T
J Digit Imaging; 1993 Feb; 6(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 8439579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of fracture and pneumonia detection: comparison of laser-digitized workstation images and conventional analog radiographs.
Ackerman SJ; Gitlin JN; Gayler RW; Flagle CD; Bryan RN
Radiology; 1993 Jan; 186(1):263-8. PubMed ID: 8416576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image data compression in magnification hand radiographs.
Bramble JM; Cook LT; Murphey MD; Martin NL; Anderson WH; Hensley KS
Radiology; 1989 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):133-6. PubMed ID: 2909086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a pulse programmer for magnetic resonance imaging using a personal computer and a high-speed digital input-output board.
Hashimoto S; Kose K; Haishi T
Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 May; 83(5):053702. PubMed ID: 22667620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast information of digital imaging in laser film digitizer and display monitor.
Lo SC; Gaskill JW; Mun SK; Krasner BH
J Digit Imaging; 1990 May; 3(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 2092810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
