These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

29 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1449877)

  • 1. Visual interpretation compared with caliper and computerized measurements in experimental vessel stenosis.
    Yanagihara Y; Sugahara T; Fukunishi Y
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):542-5. PubMed ID: 1449877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of automated quantitative coronary angiography with caliper measurements of percent diameter stenosis.
    Kalbfleisch SJ; McGillem MJ; Pinto IM; Kavanaugh KM; DeBoe SF; Mancini GB
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 May; 65(18):1181-4. PubMed ID: 2337026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements.
    Scoblionko DP; Brown BG; Mitten S; Caldwell JH; Kennedy JW; Bolson EL; Dodge HT
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 Mar; 53(6):689-93. PubMed ID: 6702614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?
    White CW; Wright CB; Doty DB; Hiratza LF; Eastham CL; Harrison DG; Marcus ML
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Mar; 310(13):819-24. PubMed ID: 6700670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation in measurement of coronary lesions on 35 and 70 mm angiograms.
    Myers MG; Shulman HS; Saibil EA; Naqvi SZ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 May; 130(5):913-15. PubMed ID: 417590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Schwartz JN; Kong Y; Hackel DB; Bartel AG
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 Aug; 36(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 1155338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer assessment of hemodynamic severity of coronary artery stenosis from angiograms.
    Siebes M; D'Argenio DZ; Selzer RH
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1985 Nov; 21(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 3853488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inability of caliper measurement to enhance observer agreement in the interpretation of coronary cineangiograms.
    Holder DA; Johnson AL; Stolberg HO; Campbell M; Gunstensen J; Joyal M; Roberts R; Biagioni EM; Vaughan W; Romeo M
    Can J Cardiol; 1985 Jan; 1(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 3850759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of the coronary angiograms.
    Tung FY; Lin SL; Chang MS; Kong CW; Chiang BN; Wang SP
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1992 Jan; 49(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 1312387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of coronary angioplasty: comparison of visual assessment, hand-held caliper measurement and automated digital quantitation.
    Katritsis D; Lythall DA; Cooper IC; Crowther A; Webb-Peploe MM
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988; 15(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 2976306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sources of error in arterial morphometric measurements.
    Roeren T; LeVeen RF; Knecht LB
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep; 23(9):672-6. PubMed ID: 3182214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of visual estimate with digital caliper measurement of coronary artery stenosis.
    Schweiger MJ; Stanek E; Iwakoshi K; Hafer JG; Jacob A; Tullner W; Gianelly RE
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1987; 13(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 3621336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Accuracy of detecting stenotic changes on coronary cineangiograms using computer image processing].
    Sugahara T; Kimura K; Maeda H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 May; 50(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 2388821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Photogrammetric methods of measuring coronary artery stenosis].
    Rychlewski G
    Kardiol Pol; 1989; 32 Suppl 1():23-9. PubMed ID: 2638429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-vitro evaluation of coronary stents and 64-detector-row computed tomography using a newly developed model of coronary artery stenosis.
    Schlosser T; Scheuermann T; Ulzheimer S; Mohrs OK; Kühling M; Albrecht PE; Voigtländer T; Barkhausen J; Schmermund A
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 18210314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical considerations on the precision of assessing blood vessel diameter in cine coronary angiography.
    Sandor T; Spears JR
    Comput Biomed Res; 1985 Dec; 18(6):531-43. PubMed ID: 4075787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cine-densitometric measurement of coronary arterial stenoses.
    Sandor T; Als AV; Paulin S
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1979; 5(3):229-45. PubMed ID: 498259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic detection method of stenotic lesions in coronary cineangiograms.
    Sugahara T; Maeda H; Yanagihara Y
    Int J Card Imaging; 1989; 5(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 2614076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computerized modeling of the human heart.
    Dössel O; Loewe A
    Z Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 27(3):167-169. PubMed ID: 28676372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement, error, information, and interpretation.
    Dvir Z
    J Exerc Rehabil; 2018 Dec; 14(6):900-901. PubMed ID: 30656146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.