These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14499052)

  • 1. The role of modelling in prioritising and planning clinical trials.
    Chilcott J; Brennan A; Booth A; Karnon J; Tappenden P
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(23):iii, 1-125. PubMed ID: 14499052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prioritisation of health technology assessment. The PATHS model: methods and case studies.
    Townsend J; Buxton M; Harper G
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(20):iii, 1-82. PubMed ID: 13678549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.
    Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A pilot study on the use of decision theory and value of information analysis as part of the NHS Health Technology Assessment programme.
    Claxton K; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Philips Z; Palmer S
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jul; 8(31):1-103, iii. PubMed ID: 15248937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review and critique of modelling in prioritising and designing screening programmes.
    Karnon J; Goyder E; Tappenden P; McPhie S; Towers I; Brazier J; Madan J
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Dec; 11(52):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-145. PubMed ID: 18031651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of technologies used to visualise the seizure focus in people with refractory epilepsy being considered for surgery: a systematic review and decision-analytical model.
    Burch J; Hinde S; Palmer S; Beyer F; Minton J; Marson A; Wieshmann U; Woolacott N; Soares M
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(34):1-157, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 22985954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Setting priorities for research: a practical application of 'payback' and expected value of information.
    Fleurence RL
    Health Econ; 2007 Dec; 16(12):1345-57. PubMed ID: 17328053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic review and economic evaluation of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of aldosterone antagonists for postmyocardial infarction heart failure.
    McKenna C; Burch J; Suekarran S; Walker S; Bakhai A; Witte K; Harden M; Wright K; Woolacott N; Lorgelly P; Fenwick L; Palmer S
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(24):1-162. PubMed ID: 20492762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
    Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Infliximab, adalimumab and golimumab for treating moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis after the failure of conventional therapy (including a review of TA140 and TA262): clinical effectiveness systematic review and economic model.
    Archer R; Tappenden P; Ren S; Martyn-St James M; Harvey R; Basarir H; Stevens J; Carroll C; Cantrell A; Lobo A; Hoque S
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 May; 20(39):1-326. PubMed ID: 27220829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review and cost-effectiveness evaluation of 'pill-in-the-pocket' strategy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation compared to episodic in-hospital treatment or continuous antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
    Saborido CM; Hockenhull J; Bagust A; Boland A; Dickson R; Todd D
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jun; 14(31):iii-iv, 1-75. PubMed ID: 20569652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The INTRABEAM® Photon Radiotherapy System for the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Picot J; Copley V; Colquitt JL; Kalita N; Hartwell D; Bryant J
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Aug; 19(69):1-190. PubMed ID: 26323045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling in health economic evaluation. What is its place? What is its value?
    Brennan A; Akehurst R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2000 May; 17(5):445-59. PubMed ID: 10977387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.