557 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14499159)
1. Comparison of bone and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of bony metastases in lung cancer.
Gayed I; Vu T; Johnson M; Macapinlac H; Podoloff D
Mol Imaging Biol; 2003; 5(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 14499159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discordant findings in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: absolutely normal bone scans versus disseminated bone metastases on positron-emission tomography/computed tomography.
Ak I; Sivrikoz MC; Entok E; Vardareli E
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Apr; 37(4):792-6. PubMed ID: 20015657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What Is the Comparative Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MDP Skeletal Scintigraphy, and Whole-body MRI as a Staging Investigation to Detect Skeletal Metastases in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma?
Aryal A; Kumar VS; Shamim SA; Gamanagatti S; Khan SA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 479(8):1768-1779. PubMed ID: 33635285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved detection of bone metastases from lung cancer in the thoracic cage using 5- and 1-mm axial images versus a new CT software generating rib unfolding images: comparison with standard ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT.
Homann G; Mustafa DF; Ditt H; Spengler W; Kopp HG; Nikolaou K; Horger M
Acad Radiol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 25586709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluorine-18 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with the standard staging procedures.
Schirrmeister H; Kühn T; Guhlmann A; Santjohanser C; Hörster T; Nüssle K; Koretz K; Glatting G; Rieber A; Kreienberg R; Buck AC; Reske SN
Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Mar; 28(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 11315604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Staging of recurrent and advanced lung cancer with 18F-FDG PET in a coincidence technique (hybrid PET).
Schmid RA; Hautmann H; Poellinger B; Kellner W; Moisseev A; Brinkbaeumer K; Weiss M; Hahn K; Dresel S
Nucl Med Commun; 2003 Jan; 24(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 12501018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "One-stop-shop" staging: should we prefer FDG-PET/CT or MRI for the detection of bone metastases?
Heusner T; Gölitz P; Hamami M; Eberhardt W; Esser S; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 19945240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevalence and patterns of bone metastases detected with positron emission tomography using F-18 FDG.
Nakamoto Y; Osman M; Wahl RL
Clin Nucl Med; 2003 Apr; 28(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 12642709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does whole-body 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography have an advantage over thoracic positron emission tomography for staging patients with lung cancer?
Aquino SL; Fischman AJ
Chest; 2004 Sep; 126(3):755-60. PubMed ID: 15364753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of whole-body FDG-PET to bone scan for detection of bone metastases in patients with a new diagnosis of lung cancer.
Cheran SK; Herndon JE; Patz EF
Lung Cancer; 2004 Jun; 44(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 15140545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer.
Hahn S; Heusner T; Kümmel S; Köninger A; Nagarajah J; Müller S; Boy C; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Stahl A
Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):1009-14. PubMed ID: 21969709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Staging and monitoring of small cell lung cancer using [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET).
Kut V; Spies W; Spies S; Gooding W; Argiris A
Am J Clin Oncol; 2007 Feb; 30(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 17278894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A meta-analysis of ¹⁸FDG-PET-CT, ¹⁸FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer.
Qu X; Huang X; Yan W; Wu L; Dai K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):1007-15. PubMed ID: 21354739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography superior to positron emission tomography or computed tomography alone for diagnosis, staging and restaging of pancreatic lesions?
Casneuf V; Delrue L; Kelles A; Van Damme N; Van Huysse J; Berrevoet F; De Vos M; Duyck P; Peeters M
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2007; 70(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 18330088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-small cell lung cancer: evaluation of pleural abnormalities on CT scans with 18F FDG PET.
Schaffler GJ; Wolf G; Schoellnast H; Groell R; Maier A; Smolle-Jüttner FM; Woltsche M; Fasching G; Nicoletti R; Aigner RM
Radiology; 2004 Jun; 231(3):858-65. PubMed ID: 15105451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical value of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after potentially curative surgery: experience with 241 patients.
Kanzaki R; Higashiyama M; Maeda J; Okami J; Hosoki T; Hasegawa Y; Takami M; Kodama K
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 10(6):1009-14. PubMed ID: 20197344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in the diagnosis of tumor recurrence and metastases in the follow-up of patients with breast carcinoma: a comparison to conventional imaging.
Gallowitsch HJ; Kresnik E; Gasser J; Kumnig G; Igerc I; Mikosch P; Lind P
Invest Radiol; 2003 May; 38(5):250-6. PubMed ID: 12750613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison and discrepancy of 18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and Tc-99m MDP bone scan to detect bone metastases.
Kao CH; Hsieh JF; Tsai SC; Ho YJ; Yen RF
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):2189-92. PubMed ID: 10928175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Accuracy of 2-[
Rashidi A; Baratto L; Theruvath AJ; Greene EB; Hawk KE; Lu R; Link MP; Spunt SL; Daldrup-Link HE
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jul; 32(7):4967-4979. PubMed ID: 35099603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
