163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14499295)
1. The dependence of the elastic properties of osteoporotic cancellous bone on volume fraction and fabric.
Homminga J; Mccreadie BR; Weinans H; Huiskes R
J Biomech; 2003 Oct; 36(10):1461-7. PubMed ID: 14499295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone volume fraction and fabric anisotropy are better determinants of trabecular bone stiffness than other morphological variables.
Maquer G; Musy SN; Wandel J; Gross T; Zysset PK
J Bone Miner Res; 2015 Jun; 30(6):1000-8. PubMed ID: 25529534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of anisotropic elastic parameters from morphological parameters of cancellous bone for osteoporotic lumbar spine.
Oefner C; Riemer E; Funke K; Werner M; Heyde CE; Schoenfelder S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2022 Jan; 60(1):263-278. PubMed ID: 34843037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Micro-finite-element method to assess elastic properties of trabecular bone at micro- and macroscopic level.
Rieger R; Auregan JC; Hoc T
Morphologie; 2018 Mar; 102(336):12-20. PubMed ID: 28893491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increased calcium content and inhomogeneity of mineralization render bone toughness in osteoporosis: mineralization, morphology and biomechanics of human single trabeculae.
Busse B; Hahn M; Soltau M; Zustin J; Püschel K; Duda GN; Amling M
Bone; 2009 Dec; 45(6):1034-43. PubMed ID: 19679206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal changes of microarchitectural and mechanical parameters of cancellous bone in the osteoporotic rabbit.
Wen XX; Xu C; Wang FQ; Feng YF; Zhao X; Yan YB; Lei W
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():263434. PubMed ID: 25918705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Not only stiffness, but also yield strength of the trabecular structure determined by non-linear µFE is best predicted by bone volume fraction and fabric tensor.
Musy SN; Maquer G; Panyasantisuk J; Wandel J; Zysset PK
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jan; 65():808-813. PubMed ID: 27788473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Properties and an anisotropic model of cancellous bone from the proximal tibial epiphysis.
Williams JL; Lewis JL
J Biomech Eng; 1982 Feb; 104(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 7078118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone volume fraction explains the variation in strength and stiffness of cancellous bone affected by metastatic cancer and osteoporosis.
Nazarian A; von Stechow D; Zurakowski D; Müller R; Snyder BD
Calcif Tissue Int; 2008 Dec; 83(6):368-79. PubMed ID: 18946628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Damage initiation sites in osteoporotic and normal human cancellous bone.
Soicher MA; Wang X; Zauel RR; Fyhrie DP
Bone; 2011 Mar; 48(3):663-6. PubMed ID: 21081188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of failure in cancellous bone using extended finite element method.
Salem M; Westover L; Adeeb S; Duke K
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Sep; 234(9):988-999. PubMed ID: 32605523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancellous bone lamellae strongly affect microcrack propagation and apparent mechanical properties: separation of patients with osteoporotic fracture from normal controls using a 2D nonlinear finite element method (biomechanical stereology).
Wang X; Zauel RR; Rao DS; Fyhrie DP
Bone; 2008 Jun; 42(6):1184-92. PubMed ID: 18378204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The loss of stiffness as osteoporosis progresses.
Werner HJ; Martin H; Behrend D; Schmitz KP; Schober HC
Med Eng Phys; 1996 Oct; 18(7):601-6. PubMed ID: 8892246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fabric and elastic principal directions of cancellous bone are closely related.
Odgaard A; Kabel J; van Rietbergen B; Dalstra M; Huiskes R
J Biomech; 1997 May; 30(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 9109560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Model for bone strength and osteoporotic fractures.
Gunaratne GH; Rajapaksa CS; Bassler KE; Mohanty KK; Wimalawansa SJ
Phys Rev Lett; 2002 Feb; 88(6):068101. PubMed ID: 11863854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level.
Homminga J; McCreadie BR; Ciarelli TE; Weinans H; Goldstein SA; Huiskes R
Bone; 2002 May; 30(5):759-64. PubMed ID: 11996916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human iliac crest cancellous bone elastic modulus and hardness differ with bone formation rate per bone surface but not by existence of prevalent vertebral fracture.
Wang X; Sudhaker Rao D; Ajdelsztajn L; Ciarelli TE; Lavernia EJ; Fyhrie DP
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2008 Apr; 85(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 17696151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis of cancellous bone failure in the vertebral body of healthy and osteoporotic subjects.
Boccaccio A; Vena P; Gastaldi D; Franzoso G; Pietrabissa R; Pappalettere C
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Oct; 222(7):1023-36. PubMed ID: 19024151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of fabric in the large strain compressive behavior of human trabecular bone.
Charlebois M; Pretterklieber M; Zysset PK
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Dec; 132(12):121006. PubMed ID: 21142320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphology-elasticity relationships using decreasing fabric information of human trabecular bone from three major anatomical locations.
Gross T; Pahr DH; Zysset PK
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2013 Aug; 12(4):793-800. PubMed ID: 23053593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
