BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14499691)

  • 1. Detection of amplified oncogenes by genome DNA microarrays in human primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with conventional comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
    Arai H; Ueno T; Tangoku A; Yoshino S; Abe T; Kawauchi S; Oga A; Furuya T; Oka M; Sasaki K
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2003 Oct; 146(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 14499691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-throughput tissue microarray analysis of 11q13 gene amplification (CCND1, FGF3, FGF4, EMS1) in urinary bladder cancer.
    Zaharieva BM; Simon R; Diener PA; Ackermann D; Maurer R; Alund G; Knönagel H; Rist M; Wilber K; Hering F; Schönenberger A; Flury R; Jäger P; Fehr JL; Mihatsch MJ; Gasser T; Sauter G; Toncheva DI
    J Pathol; 2003 Dec; 201(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 14648664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gene amplification profiling of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas by DNA array CGH.
    Ishizuka T; Tanabe C; Sakamoto H; Aoyagi K; Maekawa M; Matsukura N; Tokunaga A; Tajiri T; Yoshida T; Terada M; Sasaki H
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2002 Aug; 296(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 12147242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examination of oncogene amplification by genomic DNA microarray in hepatocellular carcinomas: comparison with comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
    Takeo S; Arai H; Kusano N; Harada T; Furuya T; Kawauchi S; Oga A; Hirano T; Yoshida T; Okita K; Sasaki K
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2001 Oct; 130(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 11675133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined array comparative genomic hybridization and tissue microarray analysis suggest PAK1 at 11q13.5-q14 as a critical oncogene target in ovarian carcinoma.
    Schraml P; Schwerdtfeger G; Burkhalter F; Raggi A; Schmidt D; Ruffalo T; King W; Wilber K; Mihatsch MJ; Moch H
    Am J Pathol; 2003 Sep; 163(3):985-92. PubMed ID: 12937139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of oncogene amplifications in medulloblastomas by comparative genomic hybridization and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tong CY; Hui AB; Yin XL; Pang JC; Zhu XL; Poon WS; Ng HK
    J Neurosurg; 2004 Feb; 100(2 Suppl Pediatrics):187-93. PubMed ID: 14758948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consistent and differential genetic aberrations between esophageal dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma detected by array comparative genomic hybridization.
    Shi ZZ; Shang L; Jiang YY; Hao JJ; Zhang Y; Zhang TT; Lin DC; Liu SG; Wang BS; Gong T; Zhan QM; Wang MR
    Clin Cancer Res; 2013 Nov; 19(21):5867-78. PubMed ID: 24009147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recurrent coamplification of cytoskeleton-associated genes EMS1 and SHANK2 with CCND1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
    Freier K; Sticht C; Hofele C; Flechtenmacher C; Stange D; Puccio L; Toedt G; Radlwimmer B; Lichter P; Joos S
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2006 Feb; 45(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 16235239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization of circulating esophageal tumor cells.
    Kim DH; Muto M; Kuwahara Y; Nakanishi Y; Watanabe H; Aoyagi K; Ogawa K; Yoshida T; Sasaki H
    Oncol Rep; 2006 Nov; 16(5):1053-9. PubMed ID: 17016592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genome-wide analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid in endometrial cancer using comparative genomic hybridization microarrays.
    O'Toole SA; Dunn E; Sheppard BL; Klocker H; Bektic J; Smyth P; Martin C; Sheils O; O'Leary JJ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(2):834-42. PubMed ID: 16681770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of genetic aberrations associated with development of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Henan, China.
    Qin YR; Wang LD; Fan ZM; Kwong D; Guan XY
    World J Gastroenterol; 2008 Mar; 14(12):1828-35. PubMed ID: 18350619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of novel candidate target genes in amplicons of Glioblastoma multiforme tumors detected by expression and CGH microarray profiling.
    Ruano Y; Mollejo M; Ribalta T; Fiaño C; Camacho FI; Gómez E; de Lope AR; Hernández-Moneo JL; Martínez P; Meléndez B
    Mol Cancer; 2006 Sep; 5():39. PubMed ID: 17002787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Landscape of copy number aberrations in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from a high endemic region of South Africa.
    Brown J; Stepien AJ; Willem P
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Apr; 20(1):281. PubMed ID: 32252688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of abnormal chromosome regions in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization: relationship of lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis to selected abnormal regions.
    Sakai N; Kajiyama Y; Iwanuma Y; Tomita N; Amano T; Isayama F; Ouchi K; Tsurumaru M
    Dis Esophagus; 2010 Jul; 23(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 19930403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of genetic rearrangements in esophageal squamous carcinoma cell lines by a combination of M-FISH and array-CGH: further confirmation of some split genomic regions in primary tumors.
    Hao JJ; Shi ZZ; Zhao ZX; Zhang Y; Gong T; Li CX; Zhan T; Cai Y; Dong JT; Fu SB; Zhan QM; Wang MR
    BMC Cancer; 2012 Aug; 12():367. PubMed ID: 22920630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome-wide screening for genetic alterations in esophageal cancer by aCGH identifies 11q13 amplification oncogenes associated with nodal metastasis.
    Ying J; Shan L; Li J; Zhong L; Xue L; Zhao H; Li L; Langford C; Guo L; Qiu T; Lu N; Tao Q
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e39797. PubMed ID: 22761904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Array CGH identifies distinct DNA copy number profiles of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in chromosomal- and microsatellite-unstable sporadic colorectal carcinomas.
    Lassmann S; Weis R; Makowiec F; Roth J; Danciu M; Hopt U; Werner M
    J Mol Med (Berl); 2007 Mar; 85(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 17143621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic DNA-chip hybridization reveals a higher incidence of genomic amplifications in pancreatic cancer than conventional comparative genomic hybridization and leads to the identification of novel candidate genes.
    Holzmann K; Kohlhammer H; Schwaenen C; Wessendorf S; Kestler HA; Schwoerer A; Rau B; Radlwimmer B; Döhner H; Lichter P; Gress T; Bentz M
    Cancer Res; 2004 Jul; 64(13):4428-33. PubMed ID: 15231651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of a novel gene, GASC1, within an amplicon at 9p23-24 frequently detected in esophageal cancer cell lines.
    Yang ZQ; Imoto I; Fukuda Y; Pimkhaokham A; Shimada Y; Imamura M; Sugano S; Nakamura Y; Inazawa J
    Cancer Res; 2000 Sep; 60(17):4735-9. PubMed ID: 10987278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genome wide detection of oncogene amplifications in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by array based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Hui AB; Lo KW; Teo PM; To KF; Huang DP
    Int J Oncol; 2002 Mar; 20(3):467-73. PubMed ID: 11836556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.