BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14499713)

  • 1. [Uterine receptivity and embryo implantation. The use of transvaginal scan and Doppler study in its evaluation in ART].
    Porcu G; Dechaud H; Hédon B
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Sep; 31(9):697-705. PubMed ID: 14499713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The clinical value of ultrasound for endometrial receptivity assessment in Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) procedures].
    Broussin B
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jun; 35(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 17531519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal color Doppler assessment of uterine artery impedance correlates with immunohistochemical markers of endometrial receptivity required for the implantation of an embryo.
    Steer CV; Tan SL; Dillon D; Mason BA; Campbell S
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Jan; 63(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 7805896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Contribution of ovarian and uterine color Doppler in medically assisted reproduction techniques (ART)].
    Ardaens Y; Gougeon A; Lefebvre C; Thomas P; Leroy M; Leroy JL; Dewailly D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2002 Sep; 30(9):663-72. PubMed ID: 12448362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing uterine receptivity in 2001: ultrasonographic glances at the new millennium.
    Fanchin R
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2001 Sep; 943():185-202. PubMed ID: 11594540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Three-dimensional ultrasonographic uterine vascularization and embryo implantation].
    Kupesic S
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2004 Feb; 33(1 Pt 2):S18-20. PubMed ID: 14968039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging the endometrium: are there predictors of uterine receptivity?
    Pierson RA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2003 May; 25(5):360-8. PubMed ID: 12738977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal timing of ultrasonographic and Doppler evaluation of uterine receptivity to implantation.
    Dechaud H; Bessueille E; Bousquet PJ; Reyftmann L; Hamamah S; Hedon B
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Mar; 16(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 18339259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Sonographic aspects in the study of endometrial receptivity in women undergoing in vitro fertilization].
    Salzillo PL; Salzillo ME; Iannella I; Cobellis L; Colacurci N
    Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Aug; 62(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 20827244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preliminary report of an ultrasonography and colour Doppler uterine score to predict uterine receptivity in an in-vitro fertilization programme.
    Salle B; Bied-Damon V; Benchaib M; Desperes S; Gaucherand P; Rudigoz RC
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Jun; 13(6):1669-73. PubMed ID: 9688410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of endometrial and subendometrial vascularity measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pregnancy during frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.
    Ng EH; Chan CC; Tang OS; Yeung WS; Ho PC
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Jun; 21(6):1612-7. PubMed ID: 16449309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thin endometrium in assisted reproductive technology.
    Senturk LM; Erel CT
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 20(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 18460935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Doppler ultrasonography and implantation: a critical review.
    Carbillon L; Perrot N; Uzan M; Uzan S
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2001; 16(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 11694734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Doppler assessment of uterine artery blood flow for the prediction of pregnancy after assisted reproduction treatment.
    Raine-Fenning N
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 31(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 18383481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of changes in utero-ovarian arterial impedance during the peri-implantation period by Doppler sonography in women undergoing assisted reproduction.
    Chien LW; Lee WS; Au HK; Tzeng CR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 23(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 15133803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Color echo-Doppler and endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilization].
    Ardaens Y; Leroy M; Lefebvre C; Tomas P; Leroy JL; Dewailly D
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1998; 26(7-8):485-91. PubMed ID: 9810119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The first three weeks assessed by transvaginal color Doppler.
    Kupesić S
    J Perinat Med; 1996; 24(4):301-17. PubMed ID: 8880627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ART and uterine pathology: how relevant is the maternal side for implantation?
    Galliano D; Bellver J; Díaz-García C; Simón C; Pellicer A
    Hum Reprod Update; 2015; 21(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 25155826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The correlation of the embryo implantation rate with uterine arterial impedance in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
    Chien LW; Tzeng CR; Chang SR; Chen AC
    Early Pregnancy; 1995 Mar; 1(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 9363232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Assessment of endometrial receptivity by color Doppler and ultrasound imaging].
    Lilić V; Tubić-Pavlović A; Radović-Janosević D; Petrić A; Stefanović M; Zivadinović R
    Med Pregl; 2007; 60(5-6):237-40. PubMed ID: 17988055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.