These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14499750)
1. Motor evoked potentials from the striated urethral sphincter and puborectal muscle: reproducibility of latencies. Brostrom S; Jennum P; Lose G Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Oct; 114(10):1891-5. PubMed ID: 14499750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Motor evoked potentials from the striated urethral sphincter and puborectal muscle: normative values. Brostrom S; Jennum P; Lose G Neurourol Urodyn; 2003; 22(4):306-13. PubMed ID: 12808705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Motor evoked potentials from the pelvic floor. Brostrøm S Neurourol Urodyn; 2003; 22(7):620-37. PubMed ID: 14595605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Motor evoked potentials from the pelvic floor in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brostrom S; Frederiksen JL; Jennum P; Lose G J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2003 Apr; 74(4):498-500. PubMed ID: 12640072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motor evoked potentials recorded from external anal sphincter by cortical and lumbo-sacral magnetic stimulation: normative data. Pelliccioni G; Scarpino O; Piloni V J Neurol Sci; 1997 Jul; 149(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 9168168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Paired transcranial magnetic stimulations and motor evoked potentials. Jennum P; Winkel H; Fuglsang-Frederiksen A Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 36(6):341-8. PubMed ID: 8891473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and bladder function: A systematic review. Nardone R; Versace V; Sebastianelli L; Brigo F; Golaszewski S; Christova M; Saltuari L; Trinka E Clin Neurophysiol; 2019 Nov; 130(11):2032-2037. PubMed ID: 31541980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Motor evoked potentials from the striated urethral sphincter: a comparison of concentric needle and surface electrodes. Brostrom S; Jennum P; Lose G Neurourol Urodyn; 2003; 22(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 12579629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Segmental recording of cortical motor evoked potentials from thoracic paravertebral myotomes in complete spinal cord injury. Cariga P; Catley M; Nowicky AV; Savic G; Ellaway PH; Davey NJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jul; 27(13):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12131743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distribution and latency of muscle responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex after spinal cord injury in humans. Calancie B; Alexeeva N; Broton JG; Suys S; Hall A; Klose KJ J Neurotrauma; 1999 Jan; 16(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 9989466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motor-evoked potentials elicited from human erector spinae muscles by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Taniguchi S; Tani T Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jan; 24(2):154-6; discussion 157. PubMed ID: 9926386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Higher success rate with transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials using constant-voltage stimulation compared with constant-current stimulation in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Shigematsu H; Kawaguchi M; Hayashi H; Takatani T; Iwata E; Tanaka M; Okuda A; Morimoto Y; Masuda K; Tanaka Y; Tanaka Y Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1472-1479. PubMed ID: 28483707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimum interpulse interval for transcranial electrical train stimulation to elicit motor evoked potentials of maximal amplitude in both upper and lower extremity target muscles. van Hal C; Hoebink E; Polak HE; Racz I; de Kleuver M; Journee HL Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Oct; 124(10):2054-9. PubMed ID: 23735307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex. Arai N; Okabe S; Furubayashi T; Terao Y; Yuasa K; Ugawa Y Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):605-13. PubMed ID: 15721074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ipsilateral motor responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects and acute-stroke patients. Alagona G; Delvaux V; Gérard P; De Pasqua V; Pennisi G; Delwaide PJ; Nicoletti F; Maertens de Noordhout A Stroke; 2001 Jun; 32(6):1304-9. PubMed ID: 11387491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) and evoked pressure curves (EPC) from the urethral compressive musculature (UCM) by functional magnetic stimulation in healthy volunteers and patients with neurogenic incontinence. Schmid DM; Curt A; Hauri D; Schurch B Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 15616965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reinforcement of motor evoked potentials in patients with spinal cord injury. Hayes KC; Allatt RD; Wolfe DL; Kasai T; Hsieh J Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1991; 43():312-29. PubMed ID: 1773771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The anal reflex elicited by cough and sniff: validation of a neglected clinical sign. Chan CL; Ponsford S; Swash M J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2004 Oct; 75(10):1449-51. PubMed ID: 15377694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Representation of cricothyroid muscles at the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy subjects, mapped by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS). Espadaler J; Rogić M; Deletis V; Leon A; Quijada C; Conesa G Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Nov; 123(11):2205-11. PubMed ID: 22621909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of remote muscle contraction on transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and silent periods in humans. Tazoe T; Sakamoto M; Nakajima T; Endoh T; Komiyama T Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1204-12. PubMed ID: 17449319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]