493 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14499778)
1. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
Rex DK; Chadalawada V; Helper DJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Sep; 98(9):2000-5. PubMed ID: 14499778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates.
Deenadayalu VP; Chadalawada V; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 99(11):2138-42. PubMed ID: 15554993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies.
Heresbach D; Barrioz T; Lapalus MG; Coumaros D; Bauret P; Potier P; Sautereau D; Boustière C; Grimaud JC; Barthélémy C; Sée J; Serraj I; D'Halluin PN; Branger B; Ponchon T
Endoscopy; 2008 Apr; 40(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 18389446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
East JE; Stavrindis M; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Tekkis PP; Saunders BP
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates.
Kaltenbach T; Friedland S; Soetikno R
Gut; 2008 Oct; 57(10):1406-12. PubMed ID: 18523025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel extra-wide-angle-view colonoscope: a simulated pilot study using anatomic colorectal models.
Uraoka T; Tanaka S; Matsumoto T; Matsuda T; Oka S; Moriyama T; Higashi R; Saito Y
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):480-3. PubMed ID: 23199903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Polyp Prevention Study Group.
Bensen S; Mott LA; Dain B; Rothstein R; Baron J
Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Jan; 94(1):194-9. PubMed ID: 9934755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.
Chung SJ; Kim D; Song JH; Park MJ; Kim YS; Kim JS; Jung HC; Song IS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 20493487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap.
Matsushita M; Hajiro K; Okazaki K; Takakuwa H; Tominaga M
Endoscopy; 1998 Jun; 30(5):444-7. PubMed ID: 9693890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Third Eye retrograde auxiliary imaging system during colonoscopy.
Triadafilopoulos G; Li J
Endoscopy; 2008 Jun; 40(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 18543136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates.
Harrison M; Singh N; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Mar; 99(3):519-22. PubMed ID: 15056095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does autofluorescence imaging videoendoscopy system improve the colonoscopic polyp detection rate?--a pilot study.
Matsuda T; Saito Y; Fu KI; Uraoka T; Kobayashi N; Nakajima T; Ikehara H; Mashimo Y; Shimoda T; Murakami Y; Parra-Blanco A; Fujimori T; Saito D
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 103(8):1926-32. PubMed ID: 18647285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?
Adler A; Pohl H; Papanikolaou IS; Abou-Rebyeh H; Schachschal G; Veltzke-Schlieker W; Khalifa AC; Setka E; Koch M; Wiedenmann B; Rösch T
Gut; 2008 Jan; 57(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17681999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study.
Leufkens AM; van Oijen MG; Vleggaar FP; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22441756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of standard vs high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial.
Tribonias G; Theodoropoulou A; Konstantinidis K; Vardas E; Karmiris K; Chroniaris N; Chlouverakis G; Paspatis GA
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Oct; 12(10 Online):e260-6. PubMed ID: 19930146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of endoscopic trimodal imaging for the detection and differentiation of colonic polyps.
van den Broek FJ; Fockens P; Van Eeden S; Kara MA; Hardwick JC; Reitsma JB; Dekker E
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 7(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 19168154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High accuracy of narrow band imaging without magnification for the real-time characterization of polyp histology and its comparison with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective study.
Rastogi A; Keighley J; Singh V; Callahan P; Bansal A; Wani S; Sharma P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Oct; 104(10):2422-30. PubMed ID: 19584829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.
Pasha SF; Leighton JA; Das A; Harrison ME; Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Fleischer DE; Sharma VK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 107(3):363-70; quiz 371. PubMed ID: 22186978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
