These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14499986)
1. Cesarean section for non-medical reasons. Penna L; Arulkumaran S Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Sep; 82(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 14499986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey. Bergholt T; Østberg B; Legarth J; Weber T Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Mar; 83(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 14995922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [What should we tell our patient who requires cesarean section?]. Weiner Z Harefuah; 2014 Jun; 153(6):327-8, 367. PubMed ID: 25095604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women. Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical and practical consideration of women choosing cesarean section deliveries without "medical indication" in developing countries. Muula AS Croat Med J; 2007 Feb; 48(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 17309146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches. Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 17011403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are there "unnecessary" cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean sections for nonclinical indications. Weaver JJ; Statham H; Richards M Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17324176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Gamble JA; Creedy DK Birth; 2000 Dec; 27(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 11251511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section. Todumrong N; Somprasit C; Tanprasertkul C; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jul; 99 Suppl 4():S37-41. PubMed ID: 29916674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Women's views on elective primary caesarean section. Pakenham S; Chamberlain SM; Smith GN J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2006 Dec; 28(12):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 17169232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Theory of obstetrics: an epidemiologic framework for justifying medically indicated early delivery. Joseph KS BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Mar; 7():4. PubMed ID: 17391525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Why women request cesarean section without medical indication? Dursun P; Yanik FB; Zeyneloglu HB; Baser E; Kuscu E; Ayhan A J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1133-7. PubMed ID: 21668323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. UK O&G trainees' attitudes to caesarean delivery for maternal request. Aref-Adib M; Vlachodimitropoulou E; Khasriya R; Lamb BW; Selo-Ojeme D J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Apr; 38(3):367-371. PubMed ID: 29374994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Planned Mode of Delivery in Women with Advanced Maternal Age. Lavecchia M; Sabbah M; Abenhaim HA Matern Child Health J; 2016 Nov; 20(11):2318-2327. PubMed ID: 27473092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary nonmedically indicated cesarean section ("section on request"): evidence based or modern vogue? Grisaru S; Samueloff A Clin Perinatol; 2004 Sep; 31(3):409-30, vii. PubMed ID: 15325529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Sentilhes L; Vayssière C; Beucher G; Deneux-Tharaux C; Deruelle P; Diemunsch P; Gallot D; Haumonté JB; Heimann S; Kayem G; Lopez E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Sellier Y; Rozenberg P; d'Ercole C Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23810846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of a computerized decision aid on empowering pregnant women for choosing vaginal versus cesarean section delivery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Eslami S; Aslani A; Tara F; Ghalichi L; Erfanian F; Abu-Hanna A Trials; 2015 Dec; 16():549. PubMed ID: 26634922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]