BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14500180)

  • 1. Routine cleaning and autoclaving does not remove protein deposits from reusable laryngeal mask devices.
    Clery G; Brimacombe J; Stone T; Keller C; Curtis S
    Anesth Analg; 2003 Oct; 97(4):1189-1191. PubMed ID: 14500180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potassium permanganate reduces protein contamination of reusable laryngeal mask airways.
    Laupu W; Brimacombe J
    Anesth Analg; 2004 Aug; 99(2):614-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15271751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeat autoclaving does not remove protein deposits from the classic laryngeal mask airway.
    Bannon L; Brimacombe J; Nixon T; Keller C
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2005 Jul; 22(7):515-7. PubMed ID: 16045140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protein cross-contamination during batch cleaning and autoclaving of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
    Richards E; Brimacombe J; Laupau W; Keller C
    Anaesthesia; 2006 May; 61(5):431-3. PubMed ID: 16674615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Residual protein contamination of ProSeal laryngeal mask airways after two washing protocols.
    Stone T; Brimacombe J; Keller C; Kelley D; Clery G
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2004 Jun; 32(3):390-3. PubMed ID: 15264736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supplementary cleaning does not remove protein deposits from re-usable laryngeal mask devices.
    Brimacombe J; Stone T; Keller C
    Can J Anaesth; 2004 Mar; 51(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 15010409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.
    Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ProSeal has a shorter life-span than the Classic laryngeal mask airway.
    Doneley S; Brimacombe J; Keller C; von Goedecke A
    Anesth Analg; 2005 Feb; 100(2):590-593. PubMed ID: 15673899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protein contamination of the Laryngeal Mask Airway and its relationship to re-use.
    Greenwood J; Green N; Power G
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2006 Jun; 34(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 16802488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eliminating protein from reusable laryngeal mask airways. A study comparing routinely cleaned masks with three alternative cleaning methods.
    Coetzee GJ
    Anaesthesia; 2003 Apr; 58(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 12648116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Presence of protein deposits on 'cleaned' re-usable anaesthetic equipment.
    Miller DM; Youkhana I; Karunaratne WU; Pearce A
    Anaesthesia; 2001 Nov; 56(11):1069-72. PubMed ID: 11703239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reusable Laryngeal Mask Airways can be used more than 40 times.
    Goodman EJ; Christenson E; Douglas AM; Ziegler EJ; Lewis BR
    J Clin Anesth; 2008 Mar; 20(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 18410865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C; Morris R; Mecklem D
    Anesth Analg; 1998 Oct; 87(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 9768795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High concentration potassium permanganate eliminates protein and particle contamination of the reusable Classic laryngeal mask airway.
    Laupu W; Brimacombe J; Richards E; Keller C
    Anaesthesia; 2006 Jun; 61(6):524-7. PubMed ID: 16704584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the disposable Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the reusable LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway.
    Sudhir G; Redfern D; Hall JE; Wilkes AR; Cann C
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Jul; 62(7):719-22. PubMed ID: 17567349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nitrous oxide diffusion into the cuffs of disposable laryngeal mask airways.
    Maino P; Dullenkopf A; Bernet V; Weiss M
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Mar; 60(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 15710013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
    Lee AK; Tey JB; Lim Y; Sia AT
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2009 Sep; 37(5):815-9. PubMed ID: 19775047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomised crossover trial comparing a single-use polyvinyl chloride laryngeal mask airway with a single-use silicone laryngeal mask airway.
    Bell SF; Morris NG; Rao A; Wilkes AR; Goodwin N
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Dec; 67(12):1337-42. PubMed ID: 23020699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cuff filling volumes and pressures in pediatric laryngeal mask airways.
    Maino P; Dullenkopf A; Keller C; Bernet-Buettiker V; Weiss M
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2006 Jan; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 16409525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The paxpress airway causes more pharyngeal irritation than the reusable laryngeal mask airway.
    Goodman E; Ziegler EJ; Douglas AM
    AANA J; 2007 Apr; 75(2):123-5. PubMed ID: 17471883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.