These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14500873)

  • 1. A consensus view of fold space: combining SCOP, CATH, and the Dali Domain Dictionary.
    Day R; Beck DA; Armen RS; Daggett V
    Protein Sci; 2003 Oct; 12(10):2150-60. PubMed ID: 14500873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generation of a consensus protein domain dictionary.
    Schaeffer RD; Jonsson AL; Simms AM; Daggett V
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 27(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 21068000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structural classification of thioredoxin-like fold proteins.
    Qi Y; Grishin NV
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 15558583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic classification of protein structures using low-dimensional structure space mappings.
    Asarnow D; Singh R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014; 15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1. PubMed ID: 24564500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of structure space continuity on protein fold classification.
    Xu J; Zhang J
    Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():23263. PubMed ID: 27006112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. AutoSCOP: automated prediction of SCOP classifications using unique pattern-class mappings.
    Gewehr JE; Hintermair V; Zimmer R
    Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 23(10):1203-10. PubMed ID: 17379694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cradle-loop barrels and the concept of metafolds in protein classification by natural descent.
    Alva V; Koretke KK; Coles M; Lupas AN
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2008 Jun; 18(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 18457946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic comparison of SCOP and CATH: a new gold standard for protein structure analysis.
    Csaba G; Birzele F; Zimmer R
    BMC Struct Biol; 2009 Apr; 9():23. PubMed ID: 19374763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of SCOP and CATH with respect to domain-domain interactions.
    Jefferson ER; Walsh TP; Barton GJ
    Proteins; 2008 Jan; 70(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17634986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of sequence and structure-based datasets for nonredundant structural data mining.
    Chu CK; Feng LL; Wouters MA
    Proteins; 2005 Sep; 60(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 16001417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-over between discrete and continuous protein structure space: insights into automatic classification and networks of protein structures.
    Pascual-García A; Abia D; Ortiz AR; Bastolla U
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Mar; 5(3):e1000331. PubMed ID: 19325884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The CATH hierarchy revisited-structural divergence in domain superfamilies and the continuity of fold space.
    Cuff A; Redfern OC; Greene L; Sillitoe I; Lewis T; Dibley M; Reid A; Pearl F; Dallman T; Todd A; Garratt R; Thornton J; Orengo C
    Structure; 2009 Aug; 17(8):1051-62. PubMed ID: 19679085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A fully automatic evolutionary classification of protein folds: Dali Domain Dictionary version 3.
    Dietmann S; Park J; Notredame C; Heger A; Lappe M; Holm L
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2001 Jan; 29(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 11125048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Touring protein fold space with Dali/FSSP.
    Holm L; Sander C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1998 Jan; 26(1):316-9. PubMed ID: 9399863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. fastSCOP: a fast web server for recognizing protein structural domains and SCOP superfamilies.
    Tung CH; Yang JM
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W438-43. PubMed ID: 17485476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated assignment of SCOP and CATH protein structure classifications from FSSP scores.
    Getz G; Vendruscolo M; Sachs D; Domany E
    Proteins; 2002 Mar; 46(4):405-15. PubMed ID: 11835515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Representing and comparing protein folds and fold families using three-dimensional shape-density representations.
    Mavridis L; Ghoorah AW; Venkatraman V; Ritchie DW
    Proteins; 2012 Feb; 80(2):530-45. PubMed ID: 22081520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fragnostic: walking through protein structure space.
    Friedberg I; Godzik A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jul; 33(Web Server issue):W249-51. PubMed ID: 15980462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards an automatic classification of protein structural domains based on structural similarity.
    Sam V; Tai CH; Garnier J; Gibrat JF; Lee B; Munson PJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():74. PubMed ID: 18237410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of protein fold comparison servers.
    Novotny M; Madsen D; Kleywegt GJ
    Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):260-70. PubMed ID: 14696188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.