424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14501424)
21. What is the quality of surgery-related information on the internet? Lessons learned from a standardized evaluation of 10 common operations.
Yermilov I; Chow W; Devgan L; Makary MA; Ko CY
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Oct; 207(4):580-6. PubMed ID: 18926463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Obtaining good quality medical information from the World Wide Web.
Thom DH; Polosa R
Ann Ital Med Int; 2002; 17(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11975112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The quality of internet-sourced information for patients with chronic pain is poor.
Corcoran TB; Haigh F; Seabrook A; Schug SA
Clin J Pain; 2009 Sep; 25(7):617-23. PubMed ID: 19692804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing the content and quality of information on the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis on the World Wide Web.
Pérez-López FR; Pérez Roncero GR
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2006 Dec; 22(12):669-75. PubMed ID: 17162708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. How good is Google? The quality of otolaryngology information on the internet.
Pusz MD; Brietzke SE
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Sep; 147(3):462-5. PubMed ID: 22597577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Quality of childhood brain tumour information on the Internet in French language].
Hargrave D; Bartels U; Lau L; Esquembre C; Bouffet E
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):650-5. PubMed ID: 12957807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Internet medical usage in Japan: current situation and issues.
Tatsumi H; Mitani H; Haruki Y; Ogushi Y
J Med Internet Res; 2001; 3(1):E12. PubMed ID: 11720954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Surfing for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: perspectives on quality and content of information on the Internet.
Stinson JN; Tucker L; Huber A; Harris H; Lin C; Cohen L; Gill N; Lukas-Bretzler J; Proulx L; Prowten D
J Rheumatol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):1755-62. PubMed ID: 19531749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quality of chronic pain websites.
Washington TA; Fanciullo GJ; Sorensen JA; Baird JC
Pain Med; 2008 Nov; 9(8):994-1000. PubMed ID: 18346065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Publicly available hospital comparison web sites: determination of useful, valid, and appropriate information for comparing surgical quality.
Leonardi MJ; McGory ML; Ko CY
Arch Surg; 2007 Sep; 142(9):863-8; discussion 868-9. PubMed ID: 17875841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An evaluation of the contents and quality of menopause information on the World Wide Web.
Pérez-López FR
Maturitas; 2004 Dec; 49(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 15531123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The world wide web and robotic heart surgery.
Semere WG; Edwards TM; Boyd D; Barsoumian R; Murero M; Donias HW; Karamanoukian HL
Heart Surg Forum; 2003; 6(6):E111-9. PubMed ID: 14721995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of the quality of patient-orientated Internet information on surgery for diverticular disease.
Yeung TM; Mortensen NJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 22156872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optometry and ophthalmology: the Internet connection--assessing consumer health web sites.
Soroka M; Schachne E; Saludes I
Optometry; 2001 Nov; 72(11):713-23. PubMed ID: 12363259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. MedCIRCLE: collaboration for Internet rating, certification, labelling and evaluation of health information on the World-Wide-Web.
Mayer MA; Darmoni SJ; Fiene M; Köhler C; Roth-Berghofer TR; Eysenbach G
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():667-72. PubMed ID: 14664064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient education through the Internet: academic and private practice sites.
Rozental TD; Bozentka DJ; Beredjiklian PK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Apr; (421):50-3. PubMed ID: 15123925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Changes in subjective vs objective burn scar assessment over time: does the patient agree with what we think?
Martin D; Umraw N; Gomez M; Cartotto R
J Burn Care Rehabil; 2003; 24(4):239-44; discussion 238. PubMed ID: 14501421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The influence of quality criteria on parents' evaluation of medical web-pages: an Italian randomised trial.
Currò V; Buonuomo PS; Zambiano A; Vituzzi A; Onesimo R; D'Atri A
Technol Health Care; 2007; 15(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 18057563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Internet and the diabetic foot: quality of online information in French language.
Richard JL; Schuldiner S; Jourdan N; Daurès JP; Vannerau D; Rodier M; Lavit P
Diabetes Metab; 2007 Jun; 33(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 17347012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Scoliosis-specific information on the internet: has the "information highway" led to better information provision?
Nason GJ; Baker JF; Byrne DP; Noel J; Moore D; Kiely PJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(21):E1364-9. PubMed ID: 22772569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
