384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14501454)
1. Cochlear nerve stimulation with a 3-dimensional penetrating electrode array.
Hillman T; Badi AN; Normann RA; Kertesz T; Shelton C
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):764-8. PubMed ID: 14501454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of a novel eighth-nerve intraneural auditory neuroprosthesis.
Badi AN; Kertesz TR; Gurgel RK; Shelton C; Normann RA
Laryngoscope; 2003 May; 113(5):833-42. PubMed ID: 12792319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Far-field responses to stimulation of the cochlear nucleus by microsurgically placed penetrating and surface electrodes in the cat.
Rosahl SK; Mark G; Herzog M; Pantazis C; Gharabaghi F; Matthies C; Brinker T; Samii M
J Neurosurg; 2001 Nov; 95(5):845-52. PubMed ID: 11702876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histological and physiological effects of the central auditory prosthesis: surface versus penetrating electrodes.
Liu X; McPhee G; Seldon HL; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 114(1-2):264-74. PubMed ID: 9447940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison.
Causon A; O'Driscoll M; Stapleton E; Lloyd S; Freeman S; Munro KJ
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
Shepherd RK; Hatsushika S; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A silastic positioner for a modiolus-hugging position of intracochlear electrodes: electrophysiologic effects.
Cords SM; Reuter G; Issing PR; Sommer A; Kuzma J; Lenarz T
Am J Otol; 2000 Mar; 21(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 10733186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midbrain responses to micro-stimulation of the cochlea using high density thin-film arrays.
Allitt BJ; Morgan SJ; Bell S; Nayagam DA; Arhatari B; Clark GM; Paolini AG
Hear Res; 2012 May; 287(1-2):30-42. PubMed ID: 22531007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A technique for implantation of a 3-dimensional penetrating electrode array in the modiolar nerve of cats and humans.
Badi AN; Hillman T; Shelton C; Normann RA
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 Sep; 128(9):1019-25. PubMed ID: 12220205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array.
Middlebrooks JC; Snyder RL
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):258-79. PubMed ID: 17265124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Silicone-coated thin film array cochlear implantation in a feline model.
Van Beek-King JM; Bhatti PT; Blake D; Crawford J; McKinnon BJ
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jan; 35(1):e45-9. PubMed ID: 24317212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses to Assess the Functionality of the Cochlear Nerve Using an Intracochlear Test Electrode.
Lassaletta L; Polak M; Huesers J; Díaz-Gómez M; Calvino M; Varela-Nieto I; Gavilán J
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e413-e420. PubMed ID: 29076926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An improved cochlear implant electrode array for use in experimental studies.
Shepherd R; Verhoeven K; Xu J; Risi F; Fallon J; Wise A
Hear Res; 2011 Jul; 277(1-2):20-7. PubMed ID: 21540098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array.
Jolly CN; Clopton BM; Spelman FA; Lineaweaver SK
Med Prog Technol; 1997; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current distributions in the cat cochlea: a modelling and electrophysiological study.
O'Leary SJ; Black RC; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 3840160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using high surface area (HiQ) platinum electrodes.
Tykocinski M; Duan Y; Tabor B; Cowan RS
Hear Res; 2001 Sep; 159(1-2):53-68. PubMed ID: 11520634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
