These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14502034)

  • 1. Clinical trials in rehabilitation: what are the obstacles?
    Whyte J
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S16-21. PubMed ID: 14502034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fundamentals of clinical trials for medical rehabilitation.
    Terrin M
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S22-5. PubMed ID: 14502035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overview of clinical trials in medical rehabilitation: impetuses, challenges, and needed future directions.
    Fuhrer MJ
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S8-15. PubMed ID: 14502033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Desiderata for clinical trials in medical rehabilitation.
    Johnston MV
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S3-7. PubMed ID: 14502032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practice-based evidence research in rehabilitation: an alternative to randomized controlled trials and traditional observational studies.
    Horn SD; DeJong G; Deutscher D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S127-37. PubMed ID: 22840879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized clinical trials: the meeting place of medical practice and clinical research.
    Hughes EG
    Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 12806560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strong quasi-experimental designs for research on the effectiveness of rehabilitation.
    Johnston MV; Ottenbacher KJ; Reichardt CS
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1995; 74(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 7576417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based practice for rehabilitation professionals: concepts and controversies.
    Dijkers MP; Murphy SL; Krellman J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S164-76. PubMed ID: 22683207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical studies in rehabilitation research--problems and solutions from biometrical perspective].
    Muche R; Rösch M; Flierl S; Gaus W
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2000 Aug; 39(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 11008277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increasing the Impact of Randomized, Controlled Trials in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
    Elmunzer BJ
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Sep; 149(3):521-5. PubMed ID: 26226569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and implementation of clinical trials in rehabilitation research.
    Hart T; Bagiella E
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S117-26. PubMed ID: 22840878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized clinical trials in orthodontics: reality, dream, or nightmare?
    Zuccati G; Clauser C; Giorgetti R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):634-7. PubMed ID: 19892277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Controversies in acupuncture research: selection of controls and outcome measures in acupuncture clinical trials.
    Langevin HM; Hammerschlag R; Lao L; Napadow V; Schnyer RN; Sherman KJ
    J Altern Complement Med; 2006 Dec; 12(10):943-53. PubMed ID: 17212566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome measures for clinical rehabilitation trials: impairment, function, quality of life, or value?
    Wade DT
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S26-31. PubMed ID: 14502036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based practice: methods to evaluate individual patient improvement.
    Ottenbacher KJ; Hinderer SR
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Oct; 80(10):786-96. PubMed ID: 11562563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological idiosyncracies, frameworks and challenges of non-pharmaceutical and non-technical treatment interventions.
    Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 23790697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research in rehabilitation medicine: methodological challenges.
    Wade DT; Smeets RJ; Verbunt JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 63(7):699-704. PubMed ID: 19788953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ontology of randomized controlled trials for evidence-based practice: content specification and evaluation using the competency decomposition method.
    Sim I; Olasov B; Carini S
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Apr; 37(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 15120657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Jumping in before the water is hot: the need to support randomized controlled clinical trials.
    Epstein AE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Aug; 15(8):867-9. PubMed ID: 15333076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.