138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14502489)
1. Structure-based versus property-based approaches in the design of G-protein-coupled receptor-targeted libraries.
Balakin KV; Lang SA; Skorenko AV; Tkachenko SE; Ivashchenko AA; Savchuk NP
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(5):1553-62. PubMed ID: 14502489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols.
Evers A; Hessler G; Matter H; Klabunde T
J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(17):5448-65. PubMed ID: 16107144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The 7 TM G-protein-coupled receptor target family.
Jacoby E; Bouhelal R; Gerspacher M; Seuwen K
ChemMedChem; 2006 Aug; 1(8):761-82. PubMed ID: 16902930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strategies for designing GPCR-focused libraries and screening sets.
Jimonet P; Jäger R
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2004 May; 7(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 15216936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selecting compounds for focused screening using linear discriminant analysis and artificial neural networks.
Ford MG; Pitt WR; Whitley DC
J Mol Graph Model; 2004 Jul; 22(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 15182805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Molecule kernels: a descriptor- and alignment-free quantitative structure-activity relationship approach.
Mohr JA; Jain BJ; Obermayer K
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1868-81. PubMed ID: 18767832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. G-protein-coupled receptor affinity prediction based on the use of a profiling dataset: QSAR design, synthesis, and experimental validation.
Rolland C; Gozalbes R; Nicolaï E; Paugam MF; Coussy L; Barbosa F; Horvath D; Revah F
J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(21):6563-74. PubMed ID: 16220973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shape signatures: a new approach to computer-aided ligand- and receptor-based drug design.
Zauhar RJ; Moyna G; Tian L; Li Z; Welsh WJ
J Med Chem; 2003 Dec; 46(26):5674-90. PubMed ID: 14667221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination and mapping of activity-specific descriptor value ranges for the identification of active compounds.
Eckert H; Bajorath J
J Med Chem; 2006 Apr; 49(7):2284-93. PubMed ID: 16570925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. QSAR modeling of anti-invasive activity of organic compounds using structural descriptors.
Katritzky AR; Kuanar M; Dobchev DA; Vanhoecke BW; Karelson M; Parmar VS; Stevens CV; Bracke ME
Bioorg Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 14(20):6933-9. PubMed ID: 16908166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Homology model-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands using docking and target-biased scoring.
Radestock S; Weil T; Renner S
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1104-17. PubMed ID: 18442221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variable selection and interpretation in structure-affinity correlation modeling of estrogen receptor binders.
Marini F; Roncaglioni A; Novic M
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1507-19. PubMed ID: 16309247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Focused library design in GPCR projects on the example of 5-HT(2c) agonists: comparison of structure-based virtual screening with ligand-based search methods.
Bissantz C; Schalon C; Guba W; Stahl M
Proteins; 2005 Dec; 61(4):938-52. PubMed ID: 16224780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anticancer activity of selected phenolic compounds: QSAR studies using ridge regression and neural networks.
Nandi S; Vracko M; Bagchi MC
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Nov; 70(5):424-36. PubMed ID: 17949360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Virtual screen for ligands of orphan G protein-coupled receptors.
Bock JR; Gough DA
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(5):1402-14. PubMed ID: 16180917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design and exploration of target-selective chemical space representations.
Vogt I; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jul; 48(7):1389-95. PubMed ID: 18558671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. G-protein coupled receptors virtual screening using genetic algorithm focused chemical space.
Sage C; Wang R; Jones G
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1754-61. PubMed ID: 21761904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A group center overlap based approach for "3D QSAR" studies on TIBO derivatives.
Sapre NS; Gupta S; Pancholi N; Sapre N
J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(6):922-33. PubMed ID: 18785154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling of human cytochrome p450-mediated drug metabolism using unsupervised machine learning approach.
Korolev D; Balakin KV; Nikolsky Y; Kirillov E; Ivanenkov YA; Savchuk NP; Ivashchenko AA; Nikolskaya T
J Med Chem; 2003 Aug; 46(17):3631-43. PubMed ID: 12904067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finding ligands for G protein-coupled receptors based on the protein-compound affinity matrix.
Fukunishi Y; Kubota S; Nakamura H
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jan; 25(5):633-43. PubMed ID: 16777448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
