246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14502690)
1. Voluntariness, intention, and the defence of mental disorder: toward a rational approach.
McSherry B
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):581-99. PubMed ID: 14502690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Without thinking: impulsive aggression and criminal responsibility.
Shuman DW; Gold LH
Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(6):723-34. PubMed ID: 19039791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mens rea.
Carson DC; Felthous AR
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):559-62. PubMed ID: 14502688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
Bolechała F
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A mind to blame: new views on involuntary acts.
Denno DW
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):601-18. PubMed ID: 14502691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The psychiatric defence and international criminal law.
Tobin J
Med Confl Surviv; 2007; 23(2):111-24. PubMed ID: 17542186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The normative concept of guilt in criminal law between freedom of will and neurobiological determinism].
Czerner F
Arch Kriminol; 2006; 218(5-6):129-57. PubMed ID: 17217181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neurologic disorder and criminal responsibility.
Yaffe G
Handb Clin Neurol; 2013; 118():345-56. PubMed ID: 24182391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Causality in criminal forensic and in civil disability cases: Legal and psychological comparison.
Young G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():114-20. PubMed ID: 26325348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The brain-disordered defendant: neuroscience and legal insanity in the twenty-first century.
Redding RE
Am Univ Law Rev; 2006 Oct; 56(1):51-127. PubMed ID: 17051689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New neuroscience, old problems: legal implications of brain science.
Morse SJ
Cerebrum; 2004; 6(4):81-90. PubMed ID: 15986539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychology, determinism, and legal responsibility.
Morse SJ
Nebr Symp Motiv; 1985; 33():35-85. PubMed ID: 3836359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The insanity defence without mental illness? Some considerations.
Malatesti L; Jurjako M; Meynen G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 71():101571. PubMed ID: 32768100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forensic psychiatry, neuroscience, and the law.
Silva JA
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):489-502. PubMed ID: 20018997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Criminal madness: cultural iconography and insanity.
Covey RD
Stanford Law Rev; 2009 Apr; 61(6):1375-428. PubMed ID: 19489183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Asperger's disorder and murder.
Schwartz-Watts DM
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):390-3. PubMed ID: 16186206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary: getting at the truth about pathological lying.
Grubin D
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 16186199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Failed agency and the insanity defence.
Matthews S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2004; 27(5):413-24. PubMed ID: 15337360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Judging mens rea: the tension between folk concepts and legal concepts of intentionality.
Malle BF; Nelson SE
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):563-80. PubMed ID: 14502689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
