These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups. Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization. Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Further comment on recycled brackets. Lewy M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):22A-23A. PubMed ID: 8338077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study. Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro surface corrosion of stainless steel and NiTi orthodontic appliances. Shin JS; Oh KT; Hwang CJ Aust Orthod J; 2003 Apr; 19(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12790351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Re: "Lip posture following debonding of labial appliances based on conventional profile photographs". Alqareer A Angle Orthod; 2009 Jul; 79(4):i; author reply i. PubMed ID: 19842295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods. Brosh T; Kaufman A; Balabanovsky A; Vardimon AD J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1107-13. PubMed ID: 15797592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Esthetic orthodontic appliances and bonding concerns for adults. Sinha PK; Nanda RS Dent Clin North Am; 1997 Jan; 41(1):89-109. PubMed ID: 9023064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laser debonding of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review. Azzeh E; Feldon PJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 12532067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reconditioning of brackets]. Lepetit FX Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1988; 22(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 3268986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A new type ceramic bracket for suppression of resin remaining in debonding. Kinami H; Sugimura M; Sakuda M; Okazaki M; Kimura H J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1990 Dec; 30():106-14. PubMed ID: 2130164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel. Amditis C Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of debonding forces on bonded orthodontic brackets: finite element study. Lewis G; Manickam S; Wharton D Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 8761521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods. Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Re: Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets. Campbell PM Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):i; author reply i-ii. PubMed ID: 17120353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket. Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]