223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14503688)
1. Ionophores: their use as ruminant growth promotants and impact on food safety.
Callaway TR; Edrington TS; Rychlik JL; Genovese KJ; Poole TL; Jung YS; Bischoff KM; Anderson RC; Nisbet DJ
Curr Issues Intest Microbiol; 2003 Sep; 4(2):43-51. PubMed ID: 14503688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of ionophores on Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium growth in pure and mixed ruminal culture.
Nisbet DJ; Callaway TR; Edrington TS; Anderson RC; Poole TL
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2008 Apr; 5(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 18370609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An analysis of the chronic oral toxicity of polyether ionophore antibiotics in animals.
Oehme FW; Pickrell JA
Vet Hum Toxicol; 1999 Aug; 41(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 10434384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of ionophores in cattle diets for mitigation of enteric methane.
Guan H; Wittenberg KM; Ominski KH; Krause DO
J Anim Sci; 2006 Jul; 84(7):1896-906. PubMed ID: 16775074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The susceptibility of ionophore-resistant Clostridium aminophilum F to other antibiotics.
Houlihan AJ; Russell JB
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2003 Oct; 52(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 12951349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The veterinary importance of the toxic syndrome induced by ionophores.
Novilla MN
Vet Hum Toxicol; 1992 Feb; 34(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 1621367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ionophores: their effect on production efficiency and mode of action.
Bergen WG; Bates DB
J Anim Sci; 1984 Jun; 58(6):1465-83. PubMed ID: 6378864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antibiotic resistance in bacteria associated with food animals: a United States perspective of livestock production.
Mathew AG; Cissell R; Liamthong S
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2007; 4(2):115-33. PubMed ID: 17600481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Growth promoting antimicrobials].
Hoogkamp-Korstanje JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Jun; 143(25):1293-5. PubMed ID: 10416481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ionophore resistance of ruminal bacteria and its potential impact on human health.
Russell JB; Houlihan AJ
FEMS Microbiol Rev; 2003 Apr; 27(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 12697342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle.
Jacob ME; Fox JT; Narayanan SK; Drouillard JS; Renter DG; Nagaraja TG
J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1182-90. PubMed ID: 18192558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of ionophores and antibiotics on in vitro hydrogen sulfide production, dry matter disappearance, and total gas production in cultures with a steam-flaked corn-based substrate with or without added sulfur.
Quinn MJ; May ML; Hales KE; DiLorenzo N; Leibovich J; Smith DR; Galyean ML
J Anim Sci; 2009 May; 87(5):1705-13. PubMed ID: 19213713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The problem of the use of antibiotics in animal production and the appearance of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains in man].
Kolb E
Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1981 Dec; 36(24):945-50. PubMed ID: 7039154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inhibition of resistance plasmid transfer in Escherichia coli by ionophores, chlortetracycline, bacitracin, and ionophore/antimicrobial combinations.
Mathers JJ; Clark SR; Hausmann D; Tillman P; Benning VR; Gordon SK
Avian Dis; 2004; 48(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 15283418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of ionophores in lactating dairy cattle: a review.
Duffield TF; Bagg RN
Can Vet J; 2000 May; 41(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 10816832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of live yeasts in rumen ecosystem.
Oeztuerk H; Sagmanligil V
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2009 Jul; 116(7):244-8. PubMed ID: 19753793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Susceptibility of Escherichia coli from growing piglets receiving antimicrobial feed additives.
Kim LM; Gray JT; Harmon BG; Jones RD; Fedorka-Cray PJ
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2005; 2(4):304-16. PubMed ID: 16366853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance among food animals: principles and limitations.
Aarestrup FM
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2004; 51(8-9):380-8. PubMed ID: 15525370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 1. Feedlot performance, carcass quality, and production costs.
Berthiaume R; Mandell I; Faucitano L; Lafrenière C
J Anim Sci; 2006 Aug; 84(8):2168-77. PubMed ID: 16864879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
