These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14503747)

  • 1. Cementless stems in patients aged >60 years: justified use.
    Engh CA; Leung S
    Orthopedics; 2003 Sep; 26(9):921, 948. PubMed ID: 14503747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.
    Tanzer M; Graves SE; Peng A; Shimmin AJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 29683803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long, titanium, cemented stems decreased late periprosthetic fractures and revisions in patients with severe bone loss and previous revision.
    Hernigou P; Dupuys N; Delambre J; Guissou I; Poignard A; Allain J; Flouzat Lachaniette CH
    Int Orthop; 2015 Apr; 39(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 25231573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cementless stems in patients aged >60 years: just say no.
    Ranawat CS; Rasquinha VJ; Ranawat AS
    Orthopedics; 2003 Sep; 26(9):920, 922. PubMed ID: 14503746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age or younger: a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Takenaga RK; Callaghan JJ; Bedard NA; Liu SS; Klaassen AL; Pedersen DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):2153-9. PubMed ID: 23224386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critical look at cementless stems. Taper designs and when to use alternatives.
    Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):212-23. PubMed ID: 9917606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.
    Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should patient age thresholds dictate fixation strategy in total hip arthroplasty?
    Bloch BV; White JJE; Matar HE; Berber R; Manktelow ARJ
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Feb; 104-B(2):206-211. PubMed ID: 35094580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary hip fixation. Cemented stems: a little difference, a lot of damage.
    Callaghan JJ; Templeton JE
    Orthopedics; 2003 Sep; 26(9):909. PubMed ID: 14503742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
    Kubinec V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cost analysis of cemented versus cementless total hip replacement operations on the NHS.
    Kallala R; Anderson P; Morris S; Haddad FS
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Jul; 95-B(7):874-6. PubMed ID: 23814235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revision total hip replacement using a cementless interlocking distal femoral stem with allograft-cemented composite and the application of intramedullary and onlay cortical strut allografts: two case reports.
    Uchiyama K; Takahira N; Narahara H; Fukushima K; Yamamoto T; Moriya M; Kawamura T; Urabe K; Sakai R; Itoman M; Takaso M
    J Orthop Sci; 2012 May; 17(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 21604045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The young osteoarthritic hip: Clinical outcome of total hip arthroplasty and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Busch V
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2015 Jun; 86(360):1-21. PubMed ID: 25898151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acetabular fixation options: notes from the other side.
    Stulberg SD
    Orthopedics; 2003 Sep; 26(9):915-6. PubMed ID: 14503745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cemented Femoral Component Use in Hip Arthroplasty.
    Scanelli JA; Reiser GR; Sloboda JF; Moskal JT
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2019 Feb; 27(4):119-127. PubMed ID: 30531379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cemented
    Veldman HD; Heyligers IC; Grimm B; Boymans TA
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4):421-431. PubMed ID: 28385929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Not all cementless femoral stems are created equal but the results may be comparable.
    Carlson SW; Liu SS; Callaghan JJ
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(1 Supple A):14-17. PubMed ID: 28042113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uncemented or cemented stems in first-time revision total hip replacement? An observational study of 867 patients including assessment of femoral bone defect size.
    Tyson Y; Hillman C; Majenburg N; Sköldenberg O; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J; Mohaddes M; Hailer NP
    Acta Orthop; 2021 Apr; 92(2):143-150. PubMed ID: 33176549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Synergy cementless femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 15 years.
    De Martino I; De Santis V; D'Apolito R; Sculco PK; Cross MB; Gasparini G
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 28053254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cemented polyethylene and cementless porous-coated acetabular components have similar outcomes at a mean of seven years after total hip replacement: a prospective randomised study.
    Angadi DS; Brown S; Crawfurd EJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1604-10. PubMed ID: 23188899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.