127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14503754)
1. The use of extensively coated stems in femoral revision surgery.
Fehring TK
Orthopedics; 2003 Sep; 26(9):935-6. PubMed ID: 14503754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty.
Paprosky WG; Greidanus NV; Antoniou J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Dec; (369):230-42. PubMed ID: 10611878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revision total hip arthroplasty after removal of a fractured well-fixed extensively porous-coated femoral component using a trephine.
Amanatullah DF; Siman H; Pallante GD; Haber DB; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1192-6. PubMed ID: 26330584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extensively coated femoral components in revision hip arthroplasty: follow-up study of 23 patients.
Ng FY; Chiu KY; Yau WP; Ng TP; Tang WM
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2004 Dec; 12(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 15621901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extensively coated non-modular stem used in two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty: mid-term to long-term follow-up.
Shen B; Huang Q; Yang J; Zhou ZK; Kang PD; Pei FX
Orthop Surg; 2014 May; 6(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 24890291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts.
Ding ZC; Ling TX; Yuan MC; Qin YZ; Mou P; Wang HY; Zhou ZK
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 32268894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What Is the Risk of Revision Surgery in Hydroxyapatite-coated Femoral Hip Stems? Findings From a Large National Registry.
Inacio MC; Lorimer M; Davidson DC; De Steiger RN; Lewis PL; Graves SE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2353-2366. PubMed ID: 30303878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress-shielding of the proximal femur using an extensively porous-coated femoral component without allograft in revision surgery: a 5- to 17-year follow-up study.
Garcia-Cimbrelo E; Garcia-Rey E; Cruz-Pardos A; Madero R
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Oct; 92(10):1363-9. PubMed ID: 20884972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Femoral revision surgery using a fully hydroxyapatite-coated stem: a cohort study of twenty two to twenty seven years.
Reikerås O
Int Orthop; 2017 Feb; 41(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 27131803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone restoration after revision hip arthroplasty with femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems with cortical strut allografts.
Ding Z; Ling T; Mou P; Wang D; Zhou K; Zhou Z
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 May; 15(1):194. PubMed ID: 32460781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty.
Weeden SH; Paprosky WG
J Arthroplasty; 2002 Jun; 17(4 Suppl 1):134-7. PubMed ID: 12068424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Excellent results with femoral revision surgery using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem: 59 patients followed for 10-16 years.
Reikerås O; Gunderson RB
Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 16541557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extensively porous-coated femoral stems in revision hip arthroplasty: rationale and results.
Paprosky WG; Burnett RS
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2002 Aug; 31(8):471-4. PubMed ID: 12216970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The S-ROM hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement: results of 397 hips at a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Imbuldeniya AM; Walter WK; Zicat BA; Walter WL
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jun; 96-B(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 24891571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cementless revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and primary cementless proximal porous-coated prosthesis.
Kim YH
J Arthroplasty; 2004 Aug; 19(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 15284977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ten-year results with hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old. A concise follow-up of a previous report.
Capello WN; D'Antonio JA; Feinberg JR; Manley MT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 May; 85(5):885-9. PubMed ID: 12728040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision hip arthroplasty with a short femoral component in fractured hydroxyapatite fully coated femoral stem.
Sangüesa-Nebot MJ; Soriano FC; Gabarda RF; Mordt CV
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1168.e13-6. PubMed ID: 19729273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Removal of an osteointegrated broken uncemented femoral stem after hip arthroplasty-technical note.
Wahl P; Solinger T; Schläppi M; Gautier E
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Mar; 16(1):221. PubMed ID: 33771182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Kelly SJ; Incavo SJ; Beynnon B
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 16446187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Durability of second-generation extensively porous-coated stems in patients age 50 and younger.
Moyer JA; Metz CM; Callaghan JJ; Hennessy DW; Liu SS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 19727992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
