179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14505187)
1. Finite element analysis of the influence of implant inclination, loading position, and load direction on stress distribution.
Watanabe F; Hata Y; Komatsu S; Ramos TC; Fukuda H
Odontology; 2003 Sep; 91(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 14505187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant.
Hudieb MI; Wakabayashi N; Kasugai S
J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21189091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The biomechanical analysis of relative position between implant and alveolar bone: finite element method.
Huang CC; Lan TH; Lee HE; Wang CH
J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 20936917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture.
Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis.
Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part I.
Gross MD; Nissan J; Samuel R
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 11357069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis of an osseointegrated stepped screw dental implant.
Geng JP; Xu DW; Tan KB; Liu GR
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 15453222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
