131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14506671)
1. Abnormal Pap smears with negative follow-up biopsies: improving cytohistologic correlations.
Bewtra C; Pathan M; Hashish H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Oct; 29(4):200-2. PubMed ID: 14506671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinicopathologic correlation of the unsatisfactory Papanicolaou smear.
Ransdell JS; Davey DD; Zaleski S
Cancer; 1997 Jun; 81(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 9196011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noncorrelating Pap tests and cervical biopsies: histological predictors of subsequent correlation.
Joste NE; Wolz M; Pai RK; Lathrop SL
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 May; 32(5):310-4. PubMed ID: 15830356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.
Uyar DS; Eltabbakh GH; Mount SL
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): clinical considerations and cytohistologic correlation.
Nasuti JF; Fleisher SR; Gupta PK
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Mar; 26(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 11892026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Mayeaux EJ; Harper MB; Abreo F; Pope JB; Phillips GS
J Fam Pract; 1995 Jan; 40(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7807039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytologic changes in cervical smears associated with prolonged use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate.
Valente PT; Schantz HD; Trabal JF
Cancer; 1998 Dec; 84(6):328-34. PubMed ID: 9915133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical significance of unsatisfactory conventional pap smears owing to inadequate squamous cellularity defined by the Bethesda 2001 criterion.
Adams AL; Gidley J; Roberson J; Wang W; Eltoum I; Chhieng DC
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 May; 123(5):738-43. PubMed ID: 15981813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patients with epithelial cell abnormality in PAP smears: correlation of results with follow-up smears and cervical biopsies.
Türkmen IÇ; Başsüllü N; Korkmaz P; Günenç B; Baykal CM; Güdücü N; Işçı H; Dünder I; Doğusoy GB
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2013; 29(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 24022307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears.
Negri G; Menia E; Egarter-Vigl E; Vittadello F; Mian C
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 14681941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality-assurance study of simultaneously sampled, non-correlating cervical cytology and biopsies.
Dodd LG; Sneige N; Villarreal Y; Fanning CV; Staerkel GA; Caraway NP; Silva EG; Katz RL
Diagn Cytopathol; 1993; 9(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 8513706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical parakeratosis/hyperkeratosis as an important cause for false negative results of Pap smear and human papillomavirus test.
Xiao GQ; Emanuel PO
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Jun; 49(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 19566565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical value of repeat Pap smear at the time of colposcopy.
Zardawi IM; Rode JW
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(3):495-8. PubMed ID: 12040643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preliminary assessment of the AutoCyte PREP. Direct-to-vial performance.
Tench W
J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):912-6. PubMed ID: 11127103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is p16(INK4A) expression more useful than human papillomavirus test to determine the outcome of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-categorized Pap smear? A comparative analysis using abnormal cervical smears with follow-up biopsies.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Lin YS; Fu E; Gau CH
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Apr; 97(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15790434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cytohistologic discrepancy of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in Papanicolaou smears.
Poomtavorn Y; Himakhun W; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(1):599-602. PubMed ID: 23534802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
