These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14507769)

  • 21. [Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects using masking campimetry].
    Damm G; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 1794816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rarebit perimetry for bedside testing: comparison with standard automated perimetry.
    Steven Houston SK; Weber ED; Koga SF; Newman SA
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 30(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 20548245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fixation in perimetry and campimetry.
    LYTTON H
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1958 Dec; 42(12):762-3. PubMed ID: 13607961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Swivel arm perimeter for visual field testing in different body positions.
    Flammer J; Hendrickson P; Lietz A; Stümpfig D
    Ophthalmologica; 1993; 206(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 8278154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of matrix perimetry with octopus perimetry for assessing glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Lan YW; Hsieh JW; Sun FJ
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Feb; 20(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 20436367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A review of current technology used in evaluating visual function in glaucoma.
    Turalba AV; Grosskreutz C
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):309-16. PubMed ID: 21091017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pulsar perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
    Gonzalez de la Rosa M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Sep; 152(3):500-501. PubMed ID: 21855674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of automated and manual perimetry in patients with blepharoptosis.
    Alniemi ST; Pang NK; Woog JJ; Bradley EA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013; 29(5):361-3. PubMed ID: 23924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Image processing of computerised visual field data.
    Fitzke FW; Crabb DP; McNaught AI; Edgar DF; Hitchings RA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1995 Mar; 79(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 7703195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The groningen longitudinal glaucoma study III. The predictive value of frequency-doubling perimetry and GDx nerve fibre analyser test results for the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Aug; 23(8):1647-52. PubMed ID: 19011607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Objective detection of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potentials.
    Bradnam MS; Montgomery DM; Evans AL; Keating D; McClure EA; Damato BE; McFadzean R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Apr; 80(4):297-303. PubMed ID: 8703877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automatic perimetry.
    Douglas GR
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1980 Jul; 15(3):107-8. PubMed ID: 7437935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Wishart PK
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ["After-image perimeter (Awaya)" and its clinical application. I. Assessment of visual field in hemianopsia and quadrantanopsia (author's transl)].
    Awaya S; Mano K; Miyake S; Sugawara M; Nozaki H
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Aug; 84(8):1018-26. PubMed ID: 7211582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computer-assisted perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disease.
    Younge BR; Trautmann JC
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1980 Apr; 55(4):207-22. PubMed ID: 6987469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Modern computer-aided campimetry: new trends].
    Borisova SA
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1997; 113(5):44-7. PubMed ID: 9508752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Signal/noise analysis to compare tests for measuring visual field loss and its progression.
    Artes PH; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):4700-8. PubMed ID: 19458326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry.
    Harwerth RS; Carter-Dawson L; Smith EL; Barnes G; Holt WF; Crawford ML
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3152-60. PubMed ID: 15326134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.