460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14507953)
1. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
Mello MM; Brennan TA
N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
Willcox BL
Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct.
Wadman M
Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Office of Scientific Integrity investigations: the importance of data analysis.
Price AA; Hallum JV
Account Res; 1992; 2(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 16144092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
Wright DE
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Misconduct? It's all academic..
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
Reynolds GH
Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
Sovacool BK
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
Pascal CB
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Researcher sues government and specific agency official over misconduct investigation.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):9. PubMed ID: 12530382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.
US Public Health Service
Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sitting in judgement.
Check E
Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical school guidelines for investigating misconduct and fraud in science.
Annau Z
Account Res; 1992; 2(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 11653980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct and research integrity for the bench scientist.
Pascal CB
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):220-30. PubMed ID: 10964256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A costly settlement ends whistle-blower suit.
Taubes G
Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):605. PubMed ID: 8303265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
Price AR
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
Mosimann JE
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
