460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14507953)
21. The evolution of the "scientific misconduct" issue: An historical overview.
Lafollette MC
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 10964254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Trouble for Healy over misconduct office.
Aldhous P
Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6334):361. PubMed ID: 1650429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Research universities and scientific misconduct -- history, policies, and the future.
Steneck NH
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):310-30. PubMed ID: 11653367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The fraud case that evaporated.
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
Dalton R
Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Research misconduct and its federal regulation: the origin and history of the Office of Research Integrity--with personal views by ORI's former associate director for investigative oversight.
Price AR
Account Res; 2013; 20(5-6):291-319. PubMed ID: 24028479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. More gold and more fleece: improving the legal sanctions against medical research fraud.
O'Reilly JT
Adm Law Rev; 1990; 42(3):393-422. PubMed ID: 15991411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Policing integrity.
Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):248. PubMed ID: 15902211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. HHS publishes final debarment regulations.
Levine C
IRB; 1980 Nov; 2(9):10. PubMed ID: 11661885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Ethics and fraud.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):117-8. PubMed ID: 16407910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Arizona professor files lawsuit after being fired for misconduct.
Dalton R
Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6696):817. PubMed ID: 9732854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel.
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. An end to fraud?
Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Change in fraud review proposed.
Culliton BJ
Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6366):191. PubMed ID: 1313150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
LaFollette MC
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
Scheetz MD
Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. When researchers accept funding from the tobacco industry, do ethics go up in smoke?
Wolinsky H
N Y State J Med; 1985 Jul; 85(7):451-4. PubMed ID: 11643879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The changing face of scientific misconduct.
Bevan D
Clin Invest Med; 2004 Jun; 27(3):117-9. PubMed ID: 15305801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Scientific misconduct: individual deviance or system complacency?
Luft P; Sprague RL
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 11653391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
