162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14508739)
1. Tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for cross-sectional implant site assessment in the posterior mandible.
Rashedi B; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Chaffee NR; Guckes AD
J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):176-86. PubMed ID: 14508739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of mandibular cross-sectional imaging with tuned- aperture computed tomography (TACT), iteratively reconstructed TACT, and multidirectional, linear, and transverse panoramic tomography.
Liang H; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Lang LA; Nunn ME
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 11346741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cross-sectional presurgical implant imaging using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Liang H; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Lang LA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 10455387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Array geometry for assessment of mandibular implant position using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Limrachtamorn S; Edge MJ; Gettleman L; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15140819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Array-projection geometry and depth discrimination with Tuned-Aperture Computed Tomography for assessing the relationship between tooth roots and the inferior alveolar canal.
Morant RD; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 11174606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites.
Todd AD; Gher ME; Quintero G; Richardson AC
J Periodontol; 1993 Dec; 64(12):1243-9. PubMed ID: 8106953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography for the detection of mandibular fractures.
Nair MK; Webber RL; Johnson MP
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 10980566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fractal analyses of osseous healing using tuned aperture computed tomography images.
Nair MK; Seyedain A; Webber RL; Nair UP; Piesco NP; Agarwal S; Mooney MP; Gröndahl HG
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(8):1510-5. PubMed ID: 11519567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subjective image quality assessment of cross sectional imaging methods for the symphyseal region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement.
Shelley AM; Brunton P; Horner K
J Dent; 2011 Nov; 39(11):764-70. PubMed ID: 21875641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography.
Besimo CE; Lambrecht JT; Guindy JS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10654036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-sectional tomograms obtained with four panoramic radiographic units in the assessment of implant site measurements.
Peltola JS; Mattila M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 15585805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Pre-implantation evaluation using medical imagery: scanner or Scanora?].
Hanssens JF
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 9289749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vivo comparison of diagnostic information obtained from tuned-aperture computed tomography and conventional dental radiographic imaging modalities.
Webber RL; Messura JK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Aug; 88(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 10468470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement accuracy of reconstructed 2-D images obtained by multi-slice helical computed tomography.
Naitoh M; Katsumata A; Nohara E; Ohsaki C; Ariji E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Oct; 15(5):570-4. PubMed ID: 15355399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography for dental implants: the influence of the gantry angle and mandibular positioning on the bone height and width.
Dantas JA; Montebello Filho A; Campos PS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jan; 34(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15709099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of projection geometry and number of projections on accuracy of depth discrimination with tuned-aperture computed tomography in dentistry.
Yamamoto K; Farman AG; Webber RL; Horton RA; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jul; 86(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 9690258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Linear unsharp mask filtering of linear cross-sectional tomograms of the posterior mandible.
Chen SK; Hollender L
Swed Dent J; 1995; 19(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 8560397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
