These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14509714)

  • 1. Deer diet affects ribotype diversity of Escherichia coli for bacterial source tracking.
    Hartel PG; Summer JD; Segars WI
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(13):3263-8. PubMed ID: 14509714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microbial source tracking by DNA sequence analysis of the Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase gene.
    Ivanetich KM; Hsu PH; Wunderlich KM; Messenger E; Walkup WG; Scott TM; Lukasik J; Davis J
    J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Dec; 67(3):507-26. PubMed ID: 16973226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wildlife identified as major source of Escherichia coli in agriculturally dominated watersheds by BOX A1R-derived genetic fingerprints.
    Somarelli JA; Makarewicz JC; Sia R; Simon R
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 16551490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed.
    Moore DF; Harwood VJ; Ferguson DM; Lukasik J; Hannah P; Getrich M; Brownell M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(3):618-28. PubMed ID: 16108804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial and temporal variability of ribotyping results at a small watershed in South Carolina.
    Kelsey RH; Webster LF; Kenny DJ; Stewart JR; Scott GI
    Water Res; 2008 Apr; 42(8-9):2220-8. PubMed ID: 18206209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of ribotyping and antibiotic resistance patterns for identification of host sources of Escherichia coli strains.
    Samadpour M; Roberts MC; Kitts C; Mulugeta W; Alfi D
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2005; 40(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 15613004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets.
    Casarez EA; Pillai SD; Mott JB; Vargas M; Dean KE; Di Giovanni GD
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 17650195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Geographic sharing of ribotype patterns in Enterococcus faecalis for bacterial source tracking.
    Hartel PG; Myoda SP; Ritter KJ; Kuntz RL; Rodgers K; Entry JA; Ver Wey SA; Schröder EC; Calle J; Lacourt M; Thies JE; Reilly JP; Fuhrmann JJ
    J Water Health; 2007 Dec; 5(4):539-51. PubMed ID: 17878566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Putative temporal variability of Escherichia coli ribotypes from yearling steers.
    Jenkins MB; Hartel PG; Olexa TJ; Stuedemann JA
    J Environ Qual; 2003; 32(1):305-9. PubMed ID: 12549570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of fecal Escherichia coli from humans and animals by ribotyping.
    Carson CA; Shear BL; Ellersieck MR; Asfaw A
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2001 Apr; 67(4):1503-7. PubMed ID: 11282597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fidelity of bacterial source tracking: Escherichia coli vs Enterococcus spp and minimizing assignment of isolates from nonlibrary sources.
    Hassan WM; Ellender RD; Wang SY
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):591-8. PubMed ID: 17241366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diurnal variability in concentrations and sources of Escherichia coli in three streams.
    Meays CL; Broersma K; Nordin R; Mazumder A; Samadpour M
    Can J Microbiol; 2006 Nov; 52(11):1130-5. PubMed ID: 17215905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbial source tracking in a small southern California urban watershed indicates wild animals and growth as the source of fecal bacteria.
    Jiang SC; Chu W; Olson BH; He JW; Choi S; Zhang J; Le JY; Gedalanga PB
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 76(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 17589839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Source specific fecal bacteria modeling using soil and water assessment tool model.
    Parajuli PB; Mankin KR; Barnes PL
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jan; 100(2):953-63. PubMed ID: 18703332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying fecal sources in a selected catchment reach using multiple source-tracking tools.
    Vogel JR; Stoeckel DM; Lamendella R; Zelt RB; Santo Domingo JW; Walker SR; Oerther DB
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(3):718-29. PubMed ID: 17412907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microbial source tracking in a rural watershed dominated by cattle.
    Graves AK; Hagedorn C; Brooks A; Hagedorn RL; Martin E
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3729-39. PubMed ID: 17582454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genotypic diversity of Escherichia coli in a dairy farm.
    Son I; Van Kessel JA; Karns JS
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2009 Sep; 6(7):837-47. PubMed ID: 19459756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining the source of fecal contamination in recreational waters.
    Meyer KJ; Appletoft CM; Schwemm AK; Uzoigwe JC; Brown EJ
    J Environ Health; 2005; 68(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 16121484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbial source tracking using host specific FAME profiles of fecal coliforms.
    Duran M; Haznedaroğlu BZ; Zitomer DH
    Water Res; 2006 Jan; 40(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16360192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic diversity of Escherichia coli isolates in irrigation water and associated sediments: implications for source tracking.
    Lu L; Hume ME; Sternes KL; Pillai SD
    Water Res; 2004 Nov; 38(18):3899-908. PubMed ID: 15380980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.