These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14510307)

  • 21. Nuclear guinea pigs.
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A confederate's perspective on deception.
    Oliansky A
    Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 11651141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. African Americans' views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.
    Freimuth VS; Quinn SC; Thomas SB; Cole G; Zook E; Duncan T
    Soc Sci Med; 2001 Mar; 52(5):797-808. PubMed ID: 11218181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Informed consent to medical therapy and experimentation: the case for invoking punitive damages to deter impingement of individual autonomy.
    McClellan FM
    J Leg Med; 1982 Mar; 3(1):81-115. PubMed ID: 6979601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Internet research: an opportunity to revisit classic ethical problems in behavioral research.
    Pittenger DJ
    Ethics Behav; 2003; 13(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 14552304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cold war radiation test on humans to undergo a Congressional review?
    Schneider K
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Apr; ():D9. PubMed ID: 11647965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does research ethics rest on a mistake?
    Miller FG
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):34-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Respect as an organizing normative category for research ethics.
    McGuire AL; McCullough LB
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):W1-2. PubMed ID: 16036642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ethical dilemmas in social problems research: a theoretical framework.
    Bailey KD
    Am Sociol; 1988; 19(2):121-37. PubMed ID: 11659916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Striking the right balance in research ethics and regulation.
    Miller FG
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):65. PubMed ID: 20694916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
    Nelson CH; McPherson DH
    NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. From New Haven to Santa Clara: A historical perspective on the Milgram obedience experiments.
    Blass T
    Am Psychol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 19209963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Coercion and the SATURN study.
    Resnik DB
    Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 15035945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Vulnerable populations in research: the case of the seriously ill.
    Nickel PJ
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2006; 27(3):245-64. PubMed ID: 16763881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: informed consent.
    Brody JL; Gluck JP; Aragon AS
    Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(4):285-98. PubMed ID: 11655335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adolescents as doubly-vulnerable research subjects.
    Kopelman LM
    Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 15035950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Research ethics committees--the future.
    Harris J
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):123-38. PubMed ID: 15282930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The professor is excused.
    Schwartz R
    Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(4):59-60. PubMed ID: 12762931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ethical issues surrounding human participants research using the Internet.
    Keller HE; Lee S
    Ethics Behav; 2003; 13(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 14680001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Deception in research: distinctions and solutions from the perspective of utilitarianism.
    Pittenger DJ
    Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(2):117-42. PubMed ID: 12956136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.