84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14510891)
1. Implementation of liquid-based cytology in the screening programme against cervical cancer in the County of Funen, Denmark, and status for the first year.
Hoelund B
Cytopathology; 2003 Oct; 14(5):269-74. PubMed ID: 14510891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
Hølund B; Grinsted P
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Follow-up of non-negative cervical cytological smears in the county of Funen].
Dahl MB; Hølund B; Sørensen B; Ahrons S; Grinsted P; Poulsen EF
Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5798-801. PubMed ID: 9782760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improvement of diagnostic accuracy and screening conditions with liquid-based cytology.
Schledermann D; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Nov; 34(11):780-5. PubMed ID: 17041948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePath liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer.
Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):187-94. PubMed ID: 16879266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The development of a quality assurance programme for HPV testing within the UK NHS cervical screening LBC/HPV studies.
Cubie HA; Moore C; Waller M; Moss S;
J Clin Virol; 2005 Aug; 33(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 16036178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Two cytological methods for screening for cervical cancer].
Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 May; 170(22):1933-7. PubMed ID: 18513478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cancer screening programme in Primorsko-Goranska County, Croatia--the results of the pilot study.
Vrdoljak-Mozetic D; Ostojić DV; Stemberger-Papić S; Janković S; Glibotić-Kresina H; Brncić-Fischer A; Benić-Salamon K
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 20437641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of organized versus opportunistic cervical cytology screening in Hong Kong.
Kim JJ; Leung GM; Woo PP; Goldie SJ
J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15284314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liquid based cytology: a new cervical screening system for the UK.
Wall A
J Fam Health Care; 2005; 15(3):90-2. PubMed ID: 16094904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for cervical cancer with the human papillomavirus test in an area of central Italy with no previous active cytological screening programme.
Confortini M; Giorgi Rossi P; Barbarino P; Passarelli AM; Orzella L; Tufi MC
J Med Screen; 2010; 17(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 20660436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?
Clelland CA
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):134-5. PubMed ID: 11952755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?
Imrie JE; Gardiner DS; Wilson A
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 11952754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Less pap-2 results ('minor abnormalities') in the population screening for cervical cancer since the introduction of new guidelines in 1996].
Bos AB; van Ballegooijen M; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Habbema JD
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(34):1586-90. PubMed ID: 12224483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic efficacy and validity of the ThinPrep method in cervical cytology.
Tezuka F; Oikawa H; Shuki H; Higashiiwai H
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8669188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preliminary results of the first cervical cancer screening programme in the North Eastern region of Romania.
Păvăleanu I; Gafiţanu D; Ioanid N; Grigore M
J Med Screen; 2018 Sep; 25(3):162-165. PubMed ID: 29764329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new look at cervical cytology. ThinPrep multicenter trial results.
Hutchinson ML; Agarwal P; Denault T; Berger B; Cibas ES
Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 1636340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cancer screening in Denmark.
Bigaard J; Hariri J; Lynge E
Eur J Cancer; 2000 Nov; 36(17):2198-204. PubMed ID: 11072204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Liquid-based cytology vs conventional cytology in detecting cervical cancer.
Saraiya M; Benard V; Miller J
JAMA; 2010 Mar; 303(11):1034; author reply 1034-5. PubMed ID: 20233819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
