117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14511225)
1. A combined radiographic and computerized scanning method to evaluate remaining dentine thickness in mandibular incisors after various intracanal procedures.
Katz A; Tamse A
Int Endod J; 2003 Oct; 36(10):682-6. PubMed ID: 14511225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of post length and diameter on remaining dentine thickness in maxillary central and lateral incisors.
Alomari QD; Barrieshi KM; Al-Awadhi SA
Int Endod J; 2011 Oct; 44(10):956-66. PubMed ID: 21752033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.
Akhlaghi NM; Kahali R; Abtahi A; Tabatabaee S; Mehrvarzfar P; Parirokh M
Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 20636352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of post preparation on the residual dentin thickness of maxillary molars.
Souza EM; do Nascimento LM; Maia Filho EM; Alves CM
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Sep; 106(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 21889005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parallel post-space preparation in different tooth types ex vivo: deviation from the canal centre and remaining dentine thickness.
Huysmans MC; Klein MH; Kok GF; Whitworth JM
Int Endod J; 2007 Oct; 40(10):778-85. PubMed ID: 17697109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new methodology for the comparative study of the root canal instrumentation techniques based on digital radiographic image processing and analysis.
Mikrogeorgis G; Molyvdas I; Lyroudia K; Nikolaidis N; Pitas I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):e125-31. PubMed ID: 16731376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Periapical radiographs overestimate root canal wall thickness during post space preparation.
Souza EM; Bretas RT; Cenci MS; Maia-Filho EM; Bonetti-Filho I
Int Endod J; 2008 Aug; 41(8):658-63. PubMed ID: 18479369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of the quality of root fillings in mandibular incisors and maxillary and mandibular canines using different methodologies.
van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
J Dent; 2005 Sep; 33(8):683-8. PubMed ID: 16023778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apical root canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Universal with and without PathFile.
Zanette F; Grazziotin-Soares R; Flores ME; Camargo Fontanella VR; Gavini G; Barletta FB
J Endod; 2014 May; 40(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 24767565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of increased apical enlargement on the amount of unprepared areas and coronal dentine removal: a micro-computed tomography study.
Pérez AR; Alves FRF; Marceliano-Alves MF; Provenzano JC; Gonçalves LS; Neves AA; Siqueira JF
Int Endod J; 2018 Jun; 51(6):684-690. PubMed ID: 29112281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the inner layer of dentine in oval canals.
Wu MK; van der Sluis LW; Wesselink PR
Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):218-24. PubMed ID: 12657148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Residual dentin thickness in bifurcated maxillary first premolars after root canal and post space preparation with parallel-sided drills.
Pilo R; Shapenco E; Lewinstein I
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18395536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Remaining dentinal thickness after simulated post space preparation and the fit of prefabricated posts to root canal preparation shapes.
Ha WN; Chaves GS; Decurcio D; Estrela C; Peters OA; Rossi-Fedele G
J Am Dent Assoc; 2021 Dec; 152(12):1020-1032.e12. PubMed ID: 34656294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Kesim B; Tuncay O
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1009-12. PubMed ID: 24935554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of long oval root canals in mandibular molars with the self-adjusting file.
Paqué F; Peters OA
J Endod; 2011 Apr; 37(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 21419301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Micro-CT analyses of apical enlargement and molar root canal complexity.
Markvart M; Darvann TA; Larsen P; Dalstra M; Kreiborg S; Bjørndal L
Int Endod J; 2012 Mar; 45(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 22044111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy.
Canoglu H; Tekcicek MU; Cehreli ZC
Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 17249433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentine removal in the coronal portion of root canals following two preparation techniques.
Plotino G; Grande NM; Falanga A; Di Giuseppe IL; Lamorgese V; Somma F
Int Endod J; 2007 Nov; 40(11):852-8. PubMed ID: 17697107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the minimum canal wall thickness remaining following preparation using two nickel-titanium rotary systems.
Garala M; Kuttler S; Hardigan P; Steiner-Carmi R; Dorn S
Int Endod J; 2003 Sep; 36(9):636-42. PubMed ID: 12950579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
