These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14511226)

  • 1. Factors influencing the removal of posts.
    Hauman CH; Chandler NP; Purton DG
    Int Endod J; 2003 Oct; 36(10):687-90. PubMed ID: 14511226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of post length and type of luting agent on the dislodging time of metallic prefabricated posts by using ultrasonic vibration.
    Ebrahimi Dastgurdi M; Khabiri M; Khademi A; Zare Jahromi M; Hosseini Dastnaei P
    J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1423-7. PubMed ID: 24139266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of ultrasonic vibration and various sealer and cement combinations on titanium post removal.
    Bergeron BE; Murchison DF; Schindler WG; Walker WA
    J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11487157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of ultrasound on the retention of cast posts cemented with different agents.
    Gomes AP; Kubo CH; Santos RA; Santos DR; Padilha RQ
    Int Endod J; 2001 Mar; 34(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11307266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
    Nissan J; Dmitry Y; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts.
    Gallo JR; Miller T; Xu X; Burgess JO
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Mar; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11935507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of the effect of ultrasound on the removal of intracanal posts.
    Braga NM; Resende LM; Vasconcellos WA; Paulino SM; Sousa-Neto MD
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(5):492-5. PubMed ID: 19903640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of eugenol-based endodontic sealer on the adhesion of intraradicular posts cemented after different periods.
    Dias LL; Giovani AR; Silva Sousa YT; Vansan LP; Alfredo E; Sousa-Neto MD; Paulino SM
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 20027430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of incisor teeth restored using fibre-reinforced posts and threaded metal posts: effect of post length, location, pretreatment and cementation of the final restoration.
    Schmitter M; Lippenberger S; Rues S; Gilde H; Rammelsberg P
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 20518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of several protocols for the application of ultrasound during the removal of cast intraradicular posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement.
    Garrido AD; Oliveira AG; Osório JE; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 19467051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.
    Torres-Sánchez C; Montoya-Salazar V; Córdoba P; Vélez C; Guzmán-Duran A; Gutierrez-Pérez JL; Torres-Lagares D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23929374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two methods for the removal of root canal posts.
    Chandler NP; Qualtrough AJ; Purton DG
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):534-6. PubMed ID: 12946072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements.
    Chan FW; Harcourt JK; Brockhurst PJ
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Feb; 38(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 8447770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic appearance of titanium alloy prefabricated posts cemented with different luting materials.
    Goss JM; Wright WJ; Bowles WF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):632-7. PubMed ID: 1527746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retention of posts with resin, glass ionomer and hybrid cements.
    Love RM; Purton DG
    J Dent; 1998 Sep; 26(7):599-602. PubMed ID: 9754749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal time of fiber posts versus titanium posts.
    Frazer RQ; Kovarik RE; Chance KB; Mitchell RJ
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 18686770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts.
    Pereira JR; Lins do Valle A; Ghizoni JS; Lorenzoni FC; Ramos MB; Dos Reis Só MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 23929375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.