140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14511547)
1. Exposure duration: effects on eyewitness accuracy and confidence.
Memon A; Hope L; Bull R
Br J Psychol; 2003 Aug; 94(Pt 3):339-54. PubMed ID: 14511547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates.
Brewer N; Wells GL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy.
Lindsay RC; Semmler C; Weber N; Brewer N; Lindsay MR
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Dec; 32(6):526-35. PubMed ID: 18253819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fast and confident: postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study.
Sauerland M; Sporer SL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 19309216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: the effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration.
Brewer N; Keast A; Rishworth A
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Mar; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 12009176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phenomenological reports diagnose accuracy of eyewitness identification decisions.
Palmer MA; Brewer N; McKinnon AC; Weber N
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 19954764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence.
Semmler C; Brewer N; Wells GL
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 15065979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Children's metacognitive judgments in an eyewitness identification task.
Keast A; Brewer N; Wells GL
J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Aug; 97(4):286-314. PubMed ID: 17512942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.
Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of retention interval on the confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification.
Sauer J; Brewer N; Zweck T; Weber N
Law Hum Behav; 2010 Aug; 34(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 19626432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of face age on identification from a video line-up: a comparison between older and younger adults.
Havard C; Memon A
Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):847-59. PubMed ID: 19882436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eyewitness lineups: is the appearance-change instruction a good idea?
Charman SD; Wells GL
Law Hum Behav; 2007 Feb; 31(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 16612580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The phenomenology of carryover effects between show-up and line-up identification.
Haw RM; Dickinson JJ; Meissner CA
Memory; 2007 Jan; 15(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 17479929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.
Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A problem with double-blind photospread procedures: photospread administrators use one eyewitness's confidence to influence the identification of another eyewitness.
Douglass AB; Smith C; Fraser-Thill R
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):543-62. PubMed ID: 16254742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification decisions: Effects of exposure duration, retention interval, and divided attention.
Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N; Nagesh A
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Mar; 19(1):55-71. PubMed ID: 23544475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating investigators: examining the impact of eyewitness identification evidence on student-investigators.
Boyce MA; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 18060486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to assess eyewitness accuracy and deception.
Lefebvre CD; Marchand Y; Smith SM; Connolly JF
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19303425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
