These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14511547)

  • 21. Confidence-accuracy calibration in absolute and relative face recognition judgments.
    Weber N; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Sep; 10(3):156-72. PubMed ID: 15462618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):575-604. PubMed ID: 16254744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of confederate influence and confidence on the accuracy of crime judgements.
    Ost J; Ghonouie H; Cook L; Vrij A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 17976500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of local and global processing orientation on eyewitness identification performance.
    Perfect TJ; Dennis I; Snell A
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):784-98. PubMed ID: 17852730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency.
    Brewer N; Caon A; Todd C; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):31-50. PubMed ID: 16729207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The man behind the mask: accuracy and predictors of eyewitness offender descriptions.
    Fahsing IA; Ask K; Granhag PA
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Aug; 89(4):722-9. PubMed ID: 15327357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Identifying the bad guy in a lineup using confidence judgments under deadline pressure.
    Brewer N; Weber N; Wootton D; Lindsay DS
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22933457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
    Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Are accurate witnesses more likely to make absolute judgments?
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Lemieux JM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008 Dec; 31(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 18954905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identification accuracy for single- and double-perpetrator crimes: does accomplice gender matter?
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Nov; 103(4):439-53. PubMed ID: 23034106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Eyewitness recognition errors: the effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults.
    Memon A; Hope L; Bartlett J; Bull R
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Dec; 30(8):1219-27. PubMed ID: 12661853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Criminal identification comparison: aural versus visual identifications resulting from a simulated crime.
    Hollien H; Bennett G; Gelfer MP
    J Forensic Sci; 1983 Jan; 28(1):208-21. PubMed ID: 6680738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Public eyewitness confidence can be influenced by the presence of other witnesses.
    Shaw JS; Appio LM; Zerr TK; Pontoski KE
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Dec; 31(6):629-52. PubMed ID: 17318400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance.
    Horry R; Palmer MA; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):346-60. PubMed ID: 22924858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Eyewitness identification accuracy: a comparison of adults with and those without intellectual disabilities.
    Ericson K; Isaacs B
    Ment Retard; 2003 Jun; 41(3):161-73. PubMed ID: 12737610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Change detection inflates confidence on a subsequent recognition task.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL
    Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):879-90. PubMed ID: 22017200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of eyewitness identification is significantly associated with performance on a standardized test of face recognition.
    Morgan CA; Hazlett G; Baranoski M; Doran A; Southwick S; Loftus E
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 17449097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Creating fair lineups for suspects with distinctive features.
    Zarkadi T; Wade KA; Stewart N
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1448-53. PubMed ID: 19883492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Eyewitness recall: Regulation of grain size and the role of confidence.
    Weber N; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 18377166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.