These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14511733)

  • 1. Fracture toughness of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials: effect of powder/liquid ratio and powder particle size reduction on fracture toughness.
    Mitsuhashi A; Hanaoka K; Teranaka T
    Dent Mater; 2003 Dec; 19(8):747-57. PubMed ID: 14511733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements.
    Mitchell CA; Douglas WH; Cheng YS
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jan; 15(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 10483390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Uno S; Finger WJ; Fritz U
    Dent Mater; 1996 Jan; 12(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 8598253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shear bond strength of chemical and light-cured glass ionomer cements bonded to resin composites.
    Farah CS; Orton VG; Collard SM
    Aust Dent J; 1998 Apr; 43(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 9612981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.
    Shabanian M; Richards LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture toughness ov conventional or photopolymerized glass ionomer/dentin interfaces.
    Tam LE; Dev S; Pilliar RM
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(4):144-50. PubMed ID: 8700782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strength properties of visible-light-cured resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
    Kerby RE; Knobloch L; Thakur A
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 9484165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of surface coatings on flexural properties of glass ionomers.
    Miyazaki M; Moore BK; Onose H
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1996; 104(5-6):600-4. PubMed ID: 9021332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
    Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel hyperbranched poly(acrylic acid) for improved resin-modified glass-ionomer restoratives.
    Zhao J; Xie D
    Dent Mater; 2011 May; 27(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 21377199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture toughness of resin-based luting cements.
    Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; Seghi R; Berlin JS; Lee JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 10668033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements.
    Li ZC; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):597-609. PubMed ID: 10220666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of shear bond strength of silorane resin to conventional, resin-modified glass ionomers and nano-ionomer cements.
    Babannavar R; Shenoy A
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 23355365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture toughness of various core build-up materials.
    Bonilla ED; Mardirossian G; Caputo AA
    J Prosthodont; 2000 Mar; 9(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 11074023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suitability of a shear punch test for dental restorative materials.
    Nomoto R; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2001 Sep; 17(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 11445209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term strength of aesthetic restoratives.
    Frankel N; Pearson GJ; Labella R
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Feb; 25(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 9576590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.