These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14511837)

  • 21. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17333012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preparatory states in crossmodal spatial attention: spatial specificity and possible control mechanisms.
    Macaluso E; Eimer M; Frith CD; Driver J
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Mar; 149(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 12592504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of a cross-modal manipulation of attention on somatosensory cortical neuronal responses to tactile stimuli in the monkey.
    Meftah el-M; Shenasa J; Chapman CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Dec; 88(6):3133-49. PubMed ID: 12466436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional competition between modalities: extinction between touch and vision after right hemisphere damage.
    Mattingley JB; Driver J; Beschin N; Robertson IH
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Jun; 35(6):867-80. PubMed ID: 9204491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Counting visual and tactile events: the effect of attention on multisensory integration.
    Werkhoven PJ; van Erp JB; Philippi TG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1854-61. PubMed ID: 19933568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual, auditory and tactile stimuli compete for early sensory processing capacities within but not between senses.
    Porcu E; Keitel C; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 97():224-35. PubMed ID: 24736186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multisensory numerosity judgments for visual and tactile stimuli.
    Gallace A; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 May; 69(4):487-501. PubMed ID: 17727102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Roughness perception across the hands.
    Roberts RD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1306-17. PubMed ID: 23653412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Extending visual dominance over touch for input off the body.
    Hartcher-O'Brien J; Levitan C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Nov; 1362():48-55. PubMed ID: 20850418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vision merges with touch in a purely tactile discrimination.
    Arabzadeh E; Clifford CW; Harris JA
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jul; 19(7):635-41. PubMed ID: 18727775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tactile-visual integration in the posterior parietal cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Nakashita S; Saito DN; Kochiyama T; Honda M; Tanabe HC; Sadato N
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Mar; 75(5):513-25. PubMed ID: 18355627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visuotactile interaction even in far sagittal space in older adults with decreased gait and balance functions.
    Teramoto W; Honda K; Furuta K; Sekiyama K
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Aug; 235(8):2391-2405. PubMed ID: 28493067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of cross-modal manipulations of attention on the ability of human subjects to discriminate changes in texture.
    Zompa IC; Chapman CE
    Somatosens Mot Res; 1995; 12(2):87-102. PubMed ID: 7502607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Texture perception: studies of intersensory organization using a discrepancy paradigm, and visual versus tactual psychophysics.
    Lederman SJ; Abbott SG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Aug; 7(4):902-15. PubMed ID: 6457101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of age and individual experiences on tactile perception over the life span in women.
    Godde B; Bruns P; Wendel V; Trautmann M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():135-141. PubMed ID: 30114672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size.
    Van Doorn GH; Richardson BL; Wuillemin DB; Symmons MA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):813-22. PubMed ID: 20348585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inhibition of return is supramodal: a demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition.
    Spence C; Lloyd D; McGlone F; Nicholls ME; Driver J
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Sep; 134(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 11026724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.
    Poliakoff E; Miles E; Li X; Blanchette I
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 16500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.