These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14512491)

  • 1. Balancing benefits and harms in health care: observational data on harm should complement systematic reviews of benefit.
    Vandenbroucke JP
    BMJ; 2003 Sep; 327(7417):750. PubMed ID: 14512491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to apply results from randomized trials and systematic reviews to individual patient care.
    Hodson EM; Craig JC
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Apr; 15(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 20470294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results.
    Hopewell S; Wolfenden L; Clarke M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):597-602. PubMed ID: 18411039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.
    Chou R; Aronson N; Atkins D; Ismaila AS; Santaguida P; Smith DH; Whitlock E; Wilt TJ; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):502-12. PubMed ID: 18823754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Balancing benefits and harms in health care.
    Cuervo LG; Clarke M
    BMJ; 2003 Jul; 327(7406):65-6. PubMed ID: 12855496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving depiction of benefits and harms: analyses of studies of well-known therapeutics and review of high-impact medical journals.
    Sedrakyan A; Shih C
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S23-8. PubMed ID: 17909378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Balancing benefits and harms in health care: observational data on harm are already included in systematic reviews.
    Jefferson T; Demicheli V
    BMJ; 2003 Sep; 327(7417):750. PubMed ID: 14512492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials published in the urological literature.
    Breau RH; Gaboury I; Scales CD; Fesperman SF; Watterson JD; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):1693-7. PubMed ID: 20299044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochrane reviews in pregnancy: the role of perinatal randomized trials and systematic reviews in establishing evidence.
    Dodd JM; Crowther CA
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Apr; 11(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16413839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-Based Pain Management and Palliative Care in Issue Two for 2006 of The Cochrane Library.
    Wiffen PJ
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2006; 20(4):109-11. PubMed ID: 17182519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Doing more harm than good? Do systematic reviews of PET by health technology assessment agencies provide an appraisal of the evidence that is closer to the truth than the primary data supporting its use?
    Ware RE; Hicks RJ
    J Nucl Med; 2011 Dec; 52 Suppl 2():64S-73S. PubMed ID: 22144557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Availability of large-scale evidence on specific harms from systematic reviews of randomized trials.
    Papanikolaou PN; Ioannidis JP
    Am J Med; 2004 Oct; 117(8):582-9. PubMed ID: 15465507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based dentistry and the concept of harm.
    Thomas MV; Straus SE
    Dent Clin North Am; 2009 Jan; 53(1):23-32, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 19215741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses)].
    Walther S; Schuetz GM; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2011 Dec; 183(12):1106-10. PubMed ID: 22144064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies.
    Papanikolaou PN; Christidi GD; Ioannidis JP
    CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 16505459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.
    de Craen AJ; van Vliet HA; Helmerhorst FM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 15718121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based pain management and palliative care systematic reviews in issue three for 2008 of The Cochrane Library.
    Wiffen PJ
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2009; 23(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 19296358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.