These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14512492)

  • 1. Balancing benefits and harms in health care: observational data on harm are already included in systematic reviews.
    Jefferson T; Demicheli V
    BMJ; 2003 Sep; 327(7417):750. PubMed ID: 14512492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Balancing benefits and harms in health care: observational data on harm should complement systematic reviews of benefit.
    Vandenbroucke JP
    BMJ; 2003 Sep; 327(7417):750. PubMed ID: 14512491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to apply results from randomized trials and systematic reviews to individual patient care.
    Hodson EM; Craig JC
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Apr; 15(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 20470294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Balancing benefits and harms in health care.
    Cuervo LG; Clarke M
    BMJ; 2003 Jul; 327(7406):65-6. PubMed ID: 12855496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms.
    Chou R; Helfand M
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1090-9. PubMed ID: 15968034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.
    Chou R; Aronson N; Atkins D; Ismaila AS; Santaguida P; Smith DH; Whitlock E; Wilt TJ; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):502-12. PubMed ID: 18823754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochrane neonatal systematic reviews: a survey of the evidence for neonatal therapies.
    Sinclair JC; Haughton DE; Bracken MB; Horbar JD; Soll RF
    Clin Perinatol; 2003 Jun; 30(2):285-304. PubMed ID: 12875355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Algorithm for Choosing the Study Design in Systematic Reviews].
    Peinemann F; Kleijnen J
    Klin Padiatr; 2016 Sep; 228(5):235-239. PubMed ID: 27485711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies.
    Papanikolaou PN; Christidi GD; Ioannidis JP
    CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 16505459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Norris SL; Atkins D; Bruening W; Fox S; Johnson E; Kane R; Morton SC; Oremus M; Ospina M; Randhawa G; Schoelles K; Shekelle P; Viswanathan M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1178-86. PubMed ID: 21636246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A nephrology guide to reading and using systematic reviews of observational studies.
    Ravani P; Ronksley PE; James MT; Strippoli GF
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1615-21. PubMed ID: 26113546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving depiction of benefits and harms: analyses of studies of well-known therapeutics and review of high-impact medical journals.
    Sedrakyan A; Shih C
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S23-8. PubMed ID: 17909378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews.
    Saini P; Loke YK; Gamble C; Altman DG; Williamson PR; Kirkham JJ
    BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g6501. PubMed ID: 25416499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based medicine is not all randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews.
    Ncayiyana DJ
    S Afr Med J; 2007 Jan; 97(1):7. PubMed ID: 17378267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochrane reviews in pregnancy: the role of perinatal randomized trials and systematic reviews in establishing evidence.
    Dodd JM; Crowther CA
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Apr; 11(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16413839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.