383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14512604)
1. Risks of genetically engineered crops.
Gurian-Sherman D
Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5641):1845; author reply 1845. PubMed ID: 14512604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biotechnology. EPA proposal would exempt some GMOs from registry.
Reardon S
Science; 2011 May; 332(6030):652. PubMed ID: 21551040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. National academy panel urges USDA to toughen reviews of transgenic plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):323-4. PubMed ID: 11923822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. GM crop data-agronomy and ecology in tandem.
Stewart CN; Wheaton SK
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 11135511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental regulation. U.S. courts say transgenic crops need tighter scrutiny.
Charles D
Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5815):1069. PubMed ID: 17322039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Courts upbraid USDA for 'lax review' of GM crops.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Nov; 27(11):970. PubMed ID: 19898439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ecology. Harvesting data from genetically engineered crops.
Marvier M; Carrière Y; Ellstrand N; Gepts P; Kareiva P; Rosi-Marshall E; Tabashnik BE; Wolfenbarger LL
Science; 2008 Apr; 320(5875):452-3. PubMed ID: 18436759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Agbiotech. USDA decides against new regulation of GM crops.
Stokstad E
Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6017):523. PubMed ID: 21292947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
Mandal GN
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
Hoffman DE
Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US reflects on flying eye for transgenic crops.
Knight J
Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6954):112. PubMed ID: 12968141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic technologies. Genomics, genetic engineering, and domestication of crops.
Strauss SH
Science; 2003 Apr; 300(5616):61-2. PubMed ID: 12677045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. EPA re-evaluates StarLink license.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jan; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 11135536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. US reforms rules for telling public about GM food.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2000 May; 405(6783):108. PubMed ID: 10821240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. NAS asks for more scrutiny of GM crops.
Stokstad E
Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5560):1619-20. PubMed ID: 11872806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Flawed science underlies laws on transgenic crops.
Sandermann H
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):613. PubMed ID: 12904760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Opinion: EU biotech regulations stall agricultural improvements in developing countries.
Biotechnol J; 2007 Jun; 2(6):670. PubMed ID: 17570700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
